Literature DB >> 7633858

The role of prenatal care in preventing low birth weight.

G R Alexander1, C C Korenbrot.   

Abstract

Prenatal care has long been endorsed as a means to identify mothers at risk of delivering a preterm or growth-retarded infant and to provide an array of available medical, nutritional, and educational interventions intended to reduce the determinants and incidence of low birth weight and other adverse pregnancy conditions and outcomes. Although the general notion that prenatal care is of value to both mother and child became widely accepted in this century, the empirical evidence supporting the association between prenatal care and reduced rates of low birth weight emerged slowly and has been equivocal. Much of the controversy over the effectiveness of prenatal care in preventing low birth weight stems from difficulties in defining what constitutes prenatal care and adequate prenatal care use. While the collective evidence regarding the efficacy of prenatal care to prevent low birth weight continues to be mixed, the literature indicates that the most likely known targets for prenatal interventions to prevent low birth weight rates are (1) psychosocial (aimed at smoking); (2) nutritional (aimed at low prepregnancy weight and inadequate weight gain); and (3) medical (aimed at general morbidity). System level approaches to impact the accessibility and the appropriateness of prenatal health care services to entire groups of women and population-wide health promotion, social service, and case management approaches may also offer potential benefits. However, data on the effectiveness of these services are lacking, and whether interventions focused on building cohesive, functional communities can do as much or more to improve low birth weight rates as individualized treatments has yet to be explored. The ultimate success of prenatal care in substantially reducing current low birth weight percentages in the United States may hinge on the development of a much broader and more unified conception of prenatal care than currently prevails. Recommendations for actions to maximize the impact of prenatal care on reducing low birth weight are proposed both for the public and for the biomedical, public health, and research communities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7633858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Future Child        ISSN: 1054-8289


  76 in total

1.  How well do we understand the relationship between prenatal care and birth weight?

Authors:  K D Frick; P M Lantz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Changes in births to foreign-born women after welfare and immigration policy reforms in California.

Authors:  C C Korenbrot; R A Dudley; J D Greene
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2000-12

3.  Measuring satisfaction among low-income women: a prenatal care questionnaire.

Authors:  K Raube; A Handler; D Rosenberg
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1998-03

4.  Reducing preterm and low birthweight rates in the United States: is psychosocial assessment the answer?

Authors:  G R Alexander
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1998-09

5.  1994-1996 U.S. singleton birth weight percentiles for gestational age by race, Hispanic origin, and gender.

Authors:  G R Alexander; M D Kogan; J H Himes
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1999-12

6.  The role of medical problems and behavioral risks in explaining patterns of prenatal care use among high-risk women.

Authors:  L L Clarke; M K Miller; S L Albrecht; B Frentzen; A Cruz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Prenatal care use among selected Asian American groups.

Authors:  S M Yu; G R Alexander; R Schwalberg; M D Kogan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Integrating the life course perspective into a local maternal and child health program.

Authors:  Cheri Pies; Padmini Parthasarathy; Samuel F Posner
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-04

9.  Does Maternity Care Coordination Influence Perinatal Health Care Utilization? Evidence from North Carolina.

Authors:  Marianne M Hillemeier; Marisa E Domino; Rebecca Wells; Ravi K Goyal; Hye-Chung Kum; Dorothy Cilenti; Anirban Basu
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Effects of maternity care coordination on pregnancy outcomes: propensity-weighted analyses.

Authors:  Marianne M Hillemeier; Marisa E Domino; Rebecca Wells; Ravi K Goyal; Hye-Chung Kum; Dorothy Cilenti; J Timothy Whitmire; Anirban Basu
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.