Literature DB >> 15965619

Health promotion and psychosocial services and women's assessments of interpersonal prenatal care in Medicaid managed care.

Carol C Korenbrot1, Sabrina T Wong, Anita L Stewart.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: If prenatal health promotion and psychosocial support services are to remain accessible to Medicaid eligible women, evidence is needed as to whether the services improve care and benefit women in ways that matter to health plans. The aims of this study are to determine whether prenatal health promotion and psychosocial services are associated with better interpersonal care and greater satisfaction with care; and whether the effects on interpersonal care help explain satisfaction with care. RESEARCH
DESIGN: A telephone survey of 363 African American, Latina (US and nonUS-born) and White women receiving prenatal care in four Medicaid public health plans in California in 2001. Multivariate regression analyses were done with adjustments for potentially confounding variables. MEASURES: Independent variables included dichotomous variables for health promotion advice (five separate areas) and composite scales for psychosocial assessment (six areas combined). Dependent variables included satisfaction with care, and indices for interpersonal care (communication, decision-making, and interpersonal style).
RESULTS: Women who report receiving health promotion or psychosocial services also report receiving better interpersonal care and rate their satisfaction with care higher. Receiving either type of support service is associated with higher quality communication, decision-making and interpersonal style. The effects of the support services on satisfaction are, in turn, explained by the effects on interpersonal care.
CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal health promotion and psychosocial services have associated benefits to enrollees that should matter to Medicaid health plans and their providers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15965619     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-005-4871-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  31 in total

1.  The increasing importance of patient surveys. Now that sound methods exist, patient surveys can facilitate improvement.

Authors:  P D Cleary
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-18

2.  Socioeconomic status and dissatisfaction among HMO enrollees.

Authors:  M J Carlson; J Blustein; N Fiorentino; F Prestianni
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  The effects of enriched prenatal care services on Medicaid birth outcomes in New Jersey.

Authors:  N E Reichman; M J Florio
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  The effect of expanding Medicaid prenatal services on birth outcomes.

Authors:  L M Baldwin; E H Larson; F A Connell; D Nordlund; K C Cain; M L Cawthon; P Byrns; R A Rosenblatt
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Explaining variation in birth outcomes of Medicaid-eligible women with variation in the adequacy of prenatal support services.

Authors:  R K Homan; C C Korenbrot
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Racial and ethnic differences in a patient survey: patients' values, ratings, and reports regarding physician primary care performance in a large health maintenance organization.

Authors:  J L Murray-García; J V Selby; J Schmittdiel; K Grumbach; C P Quesenberry
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Prenatal care characteristics and African-American women's satisfaction with care in a managed care organization.

Authors:  Arden Handler; Deborah Rosenberg; Kristiana Raube; Sandra Lyons
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2003 May-Jun

8.  Effects of psychosocial risk factors and prenatal interventions on birth weight: evidence from New Jersey's HealthStart program.

Authors:  Nancy E Reichman; Julien O Teitler
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2003 May-Jun

9.  Improved birth outcomes associated with enhanced Medicaid prenatal care in drug-using women infected with the human immunodeficiency virus.

Authors:  C J Newschaffer; J Cocroft; W W Hauck; T Fanning; B J Turner
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Evaluation of California's statewide implementation of enhanced perinatal services as Medicaid benefits.

Authors:  C C Korenbrot; A Gill; Z Clayson; E Patterson
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

View more
  11 in total

1.  Measuring antenatal care use in Europe: is the content and timing of care in pregnancy tool applicable?

Authors:  Katrien Beeckman; Lucy Frith; Helga Gottfreðsdóttir; Annette Bernloehr
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Provider characteristics desired by African American women in prenatal care.

Authors:  Jody R Lori; Chin Hwa Yi; Kristy K Martyn
Journal:  J Transcult Nurs       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.959

3.  Prenatal psychosocial risk assessment using event history calendars with Black women.

Authors:  Michelle L Munro; Chin Hwa Y Dahlem; Jody R Lori; Kristy K Martyn
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2012-06-14

4.  Who participates in state sponsored Medicaid enhanced prenatal services?

Authors:  Lee Anne Roman; Cristian I Meghea; Jennifer E Raffo; H Lynette Biery; Shelby Berkowitz Chartkoff; Qi Zhu; Susan M Moran; Wm Thomas Summerfelt
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2008-12-16

Review 5.  Women's experience of prenatal care: an integrative review.

Authors:  Gina Novick
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.388

6.  African American women and prenatal care: perceptions of patient-provider interaction.

Authors:  Chin Hwa Y Dahlem; Antonia M Villarruel; David L Ronis
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 7.  Acknowledging and Addressing Allostatic Load in Pregnancy Care.

Authors:  Kirsten A Riggan; Anna Gilbert; Megan A Allyse
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2020-05-07

8.  Does group prenatal care affect satisfaction and prenatal care utilization in Iranian pregnant women?

Authors:  F Jafari; H Eftekhar; K Mohammad; A Fotouhi
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 1.429

9.  Quality of prenatal care questionnaire: instrument development and testing.

Authors:  Maureen I Heaman; Wendy A Sword; Noori Akhtar-Danesh; Amanda Bradford; Suzanne Tough; Patricia A Janssen; David C Young; Dawn A Kingston; Eileen K Hutton; Michael E Helewa
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Antenatal care satisfaction in a developing country: a cross-sectional study from Nigeria.

Authors:  Dumbiri J Onyeajam; Sudha Xirasagar; Mahmud M Khan; James W Hardin; Oluwole Odutolu
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.