Literature DB >> 10728270

A performance indicator of psychosocial services in enhanced prenatal care of Medicaid-eligible women.

D S Wilkinson1, C C Korenbrot, J Greene.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Psychosocial services for low-income pregnant women vary widely in practice, and validated indicators of effective performance are lacking. The study presented here aims to determine whether a measure of provider compliance with a psychosocial service delivery guideline is associated with improved birth outcomes and therefore meets an important validity criterion of a performance indicator.
METHODS: Data on psychosocial services delivered to 3467 pregnant women came from 27 sites certified by the California Department of Health Services to provide enhanced perinatal services to Medicaid-eligible women. Multivariate regression analyses were used to test the association of adequate service delivery according to a performance guideline with birth outcomes and the dependence of the association on the credentials of the provider and the type of practice setting.
RESULTS: Women who received at least one psychosocial assessment each trimester of care according to the guideline were half as likely as women with inadequate services to have a low birthweight (OR = 0.49; CI 0.34, 0.71) or preterm birth (OR = 0.53; CI 0.40, 0.72) outcome. The effect did not depend on the credentials of the provider or the practice setting type.
CONCLUSIONS: The indicator of the adequacy of psychosocial services according to a performance guideline appears to meet a fundamental criterion for a performance indicator, an association with improved outcomes. This indicator may be useful in monitoring performance of enhanced perinatal services for continuous quality improvement of services to low-income pregnant women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10728270     DOI: 10.1023/a:1021823009297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  32 in total

1.  Randomized controlled trial of antenatal social support to prevent preterm birth.

Authors:  R L Bryce; F J Stanley; J B Garner
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1991-10

2.  The effect of expanding Medicaid prenatal services on birth outcomes.

Authors:  L M Baldwin; E H Larson; F A Connell; D Nordlund; K C Cain; M L Cawthon; P Byrns; R A Rosenblatt
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Quantifying the adequacy of prenatal care: a comparison of indices.

Authors:  G R Alexander; M Kotelchuck
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  Explaining variation in birth outcomes of Medicaid-eligible women with variation in the adequacy of prenatal support services.

Authors:  R K Homan; C C Korenbrot
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  The Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index: its US distribution and association with low birthweight.

Authors:  M Kotelchuck
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  An evaluation of the Kessner Adequacy of Prenatal Care Index and a proposed Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index.

Authors:  M Kotelchuck
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Improving pregnancy outcomes: public versus private care for urban, low-income women.

Authors:  A Handler; D Rosenberg
Journal:  Birth       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.689

8.  The association of prenatal nutrition and educational services with low birth weight rates in a Florida program.

Authors:  D L Taren; S N Graven
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

9.  Improved birth outcomes associated with enhanced Medicaid prenatal care in drug-using women infected with the human immunodeficiency virus.

Authors:  C J Newschaffer; J Cocroft; W W Hauck; T Fanning; B J Turner
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  A randomized trial of psychosocial support during high-risk pregnancies. The Latin American Network for Perinatal and Reproductive Research.

Authors:  J Villar; U Farnot; F Barros; C Victora; A Langer; J M Belizan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-10-29       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  6 in total

1.  Reducing preterm and low birthweight rates in the United States: is psychosocial assessment the answer?

Authors:  G R Alexander
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1998-09

2.  Pregnancy intentions, pregnancy attitudes, and the use of prenatal care in Missouri.

Authors:  M R Sable; D S Wilkinson
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1998-09

3.  Physician awareness of enhanced prenatal services for medicaid-insured pregnant women.

Authors:  Jennifer E Raffo; Monica Gary; Gareth K Forde; Cristian I Meghea; Lee Anne Roman
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr

4.  Who participates in state sponsored Medicaid enhanced prenatal services?

Authors:  Lee Anne Roman; Cristian I Meghea; Jennifer E Raffo; H Lynette Biery; Shelby Berkowitz Chartkoff; Qi Zhu; Susan M Moran; Wm Thomas Summerfelt
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2008-12-16

5.  Lower rates of low birthweight and preterm births in the California Black Infant Health Program.

Authors:  Winnie O Willis; Clara H Eder; Suzanne P Lindsay; Gilberto Chavez; Shirley T Shelton
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.798

6.  Quality of prenatal care questionnaire: instrument development and testing.

Authors:  Maureen I Heaman; Wendy A Sword; Noori Akhtar-Danesh; Amanda Bradford; Suzanne Tough; Patricia A Janssen; David C Young; Dawn A Kingston; Eileen K Hutton; Michael E Helewa
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.007

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.