Literature DB >> 10723871

Colonoscopy aided by magnetic 3D imaging: is the technique sufficiently sensitive to detect differences between men and women?

R S Rowland1, G D Bell, S Dogramadzi, C Allen.   

Abstract

Colonoscopy tends to be more difficult to perform in women. Women also experience more pain during flexible sigmoidoscopy, and the mean insertion distance of the instrument is less than in men. The 'Bladen system', first described in 1993, is a non-radiological method of continuously visualising the path of the endoscope using magnetic drive coils under the patient and a chain of sensors up the biopsy channel of the instrument. In 1998, results were published that used a novel computer graphics system (the 'RMR system'), in which a much more realistic endoscope could be produced using the stored positional data from the Bladen system. The RMR computer graphics system has been further refined to enable measurement of the anatomical lengths of different parts of the large intestine to an accuracy of greater than 5 mm. The system is used to analyse the results obtained in 232 patients undergoing a total colonoscopy. In women, the colonoscope tends to form loops in the sigmoid colon more readily than in men (p < 0.05). When the first 50 cm of the endoscope are inserted for the first time, the tip passes either up to or beyond the splenic flexure in 40/116, or 34.5%, of males, compared with 24/117, or 20.5%, of females (p = 0.0137). It is demonstrated that women have longer transverse colons than men, and the differences are especially apparent when a stiffening tube is used to splint the left side of the colon (p < 0.0001). The possible relevance of these observations to biomedical engineers and those manufacturing and assessing prototype endoscopes is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10723871     DOI: 10.1007/bf02513366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  15 in total

1.  Colonoscope flexural rigidity measurement.

Authors:  J A Wehrmeyer; J A Barthel; J P Roth; T Saifuddin
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  The reach of flexible sigmoidoscopy--not enough?

Authors:  J Baillie
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  Device for measuring the forces exerted on the shaft of an endoscope during colonoscopy.

Authors:  C A Mosse; T N Mills; G D Bell; C P Swain
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Non-radiological technique for 3D imaging of intestinal endoscopes: computerised graphical 3D representation of endoscope and skeleton.

Authors:  R S Rowland; G D Bell
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Real-time magnetic three-dimensional imaging of flexible endoscopy.

Authors:  C B Williams; B P Saunders; G D Bell; J S Bladen; D F Gillies; C M Guy
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  1997-07

6.  Non-radiological technique for three-dimensional imaging of endoscopes.

Authors:  J S Bladen; A P Anderson; G D Bell; B Rameh; B Evans; D J Heatley
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-03-20       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Depth of insertion at flexible sigmoidoscopy: implications for colorectal cancer screening and instrument design.

Authors:  J Painter; D B Saunders; G D Bell; C B Williams; R Pitt; J Bladen
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 10.093

8.  Colonoscopy aided by magnetic 3D imaging: assessing the routine use of a stiffening sigmoid overtube to speed up the procedure.

Authors:  G D Bell; R S Rowland; M Rutter; M Abu-Sada; S Dogramadzi; C Allen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Use of a pediatric colonoscope improves the success of total colonoscopy in selected adult patients.

Authors:  J B Marshall
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  First clinical results with a real time, electronic imager as an aid to colonoscopy.

Authors:  B P Saunders; G D Bell; C B Williams; J S Bladen; A P Anderson
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  9 in total

1.  Factors affecting colonoscope insertion time in patients with or without a colostomy after left-sided colorectal resection.

Authors:  Hui Won Jang; Yoon Nam Kim; Chung Mo Nam; Hyun Jung Lee; Soo Jung Park; Sung Pil Hong; Tae Il Kim; Won Ho Kim; Jae Hee Cheon
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  The difficult colonoscopy.

Authors:  Todd N Witte; Robert Enns
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 3.  Mechanical analysis of insertion problems and pain during colonoscopy: why highly skill-dependent colonoscopy routines are necessary in the first place... and how they may be avoided.

Authors:  Arjo J Loeve; Paul Fockens; Paul Breedveld
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 4.  Risk factors associated with longer cecal intubation time: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Veeravich Jaruvongvanich; Tomoki Sempokuya; Passisd Laoveeravat; Patompong Ungprasert
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Colorectal cancer screening and prevention in women.

Authors:  Lyssa Chacko; Carole Macaron; Carol A Burke
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-01-18       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Detailed quantitative assessment of colonic morphology at CT colonography using novel software: a feasibility and reproducibility study.

Authors:  Charles N Weber; Anna S Lev-Toaff; Marc S Levine; Sandra Sudarsky; Lutz Guendel; Bernhard Geiger; Hanna M Zafar
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-06-11       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Differences between morning and afternoon colonoscopies for adenoma detection in female and male patients.

Authors:  Shailendra Singh; Manish Dhawan; Monica Chowdhry; Michael Babich; Elie Aoun
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-09-06

8.  Use of an electromagnetic colonoscope to assess maneuvers associated with cecal intubation.

Authors:  Russell I Heigh; John K DiBaise; James A Prechel; Billie J Horn; Sarah San Miguel; Evelyn G Heigh; Jonathan A Leighton; Cynthia J Edgelow; David E Fleischer
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Colonoscopy quality with Entonox®vs intravenous conscious sedation: 18608 colonoscopy retrospective study.

Authors:  Alexander R Robertson; Nicholas A Kennedy; James A Robertson; Nicholas I Church; Colin L Noble
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-09-16
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.