Literature DB >> 10198532

Colonoscope flexural rigidity measurement.

J A Wehrmeyer1, J A Barthel, J P Roth, T Saifuddin.   

Abstract

A testing device is developed that determines the stiffness, or flexural rigidity, of an endoscope at specific locations down its length by subjecting it to a compressive axial force, a situation similar to the actual forces applied to the endoscope during a clinical procedure. The endoscope is made to deform in a similar fashion to a slender buckled column and the force causing this deformation is related to the flexural rigidity using column buckling theory. A direct relationship between the critical load needed to cause buckling and the square of column length L is demonstrated experimentally and is expected theoretically, giving confidence in the application of column buckling theory to endoscope testing. Additional confidence in the validity of the column buckling test results is obtained by their similarity to data obtained by subjecting the endoscope to a transverse load, determining deflection, and modelling the endoscope as a bent elastic beam. Several makes and models of endoscopes were tested, with flexural rigidity values typically ranging between 160 to 240 Ncm2. The effect of a metal stiffener inserted in an endoscope's accessory channel is quantified, as is the change in flexural rigidity down the insertion shaft of a graded-stiffness endoscope. Significant differences in flexural rigidity were obtained between identical endoscopes, each sharing similar usage histories, indicating the need for flexural rigidity measurements for each individual endoscope of a particular model line, though a more extensive study is required to reliably determine scope-to-scope stiffness variations for a particular model line.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10198532     DOI: 10.1007/bf02523217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  6 in total

1.  Optical resolution and color performance of electronic endoscopes.

Authors:  H K Seidlitz; M Classen
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  Efficacy of routine fiberoptic endoscope cleaning and disinfection for killing Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  C E Hughes; R L Gebhard; L R Peterson; D N Gerding
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Color performance of video endoscopes: quantitative measurement of color reproduction.

Authors:  K Knyrim; H K Seidlitz; F Hagenmüller; M Classen
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  Colonoscope length and procedure efficiency.

Authors:  J Barthel; T Hinojosa; N Shah
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.062

5.  Use of a pediatric colonoscope improves the success of total colonoscopy in selected adult patients.

Authors:  J B Marshall
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Variability in reprocessing policies and procedures for flexible fiberoptic endoscopes in Massachusetts hospitals.

Authors:  C D Reynolds; E Rhinehart; P Dreyer; D A Goldmann
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.918

  6 in total
  7 in total

1.  Variable stiffness outer sheath with "Dragon skin" structure and negative pneumatic shape-locking mechanism.

Authors:  Siyang Zuo; Kazuo Iijima; Takahiro Tokumiya; Ken Masamune
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Colonoscopy aided by magnetic 3D imaging: is the technique sufficiently sensitive to detect differences between men and women?

Authors:  R S Rowland; G D Bell; S Dogramadzi; C Allen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Dual-Continuum Design Approach for Intuitive and Low-Cost Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

Authors:  Nicolo Garbin; Long Wang; James H Chandler; Keith L Obstein; Nabil Simaan; P Valdastri
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Segmental increases in force application during colonoscope insertion: quantitative analysis using force monitoring technology.

Authors:  Louis Y Korman; Lawrence J Brandt; David C Metz; Nadim G Haddad; Stanley B Benjamin; Susan K Lazerow; Hannah L Miller; David A Greenwald; Sameer Desale; Milind Patel; Armen Sarvazyan
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Preliminary development of the Active Colonoscopy Training Model.

Authors:  Junghun Choi; Kale Ravindra; Randolph Robert; David Drozek
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2011-06-03

6.  A hydraulically driven colonoscope.

Authors:  Stuart A Coleman; Silvia C Tapia-Siles; Markus Pakleppa; Jan B Vorstius; Robert P Keatch; Benjie Tang; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Hydro-jet propelled colonoscopy: proof of concept in a phantom colon.

Authors:  Stuart A Coleman; Markus Pakleppa; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 4.584

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.