Literature DB >> 29520457

Risk factors associated with longer cecal intubation time: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Veeravich Jaruvongvanich1, Tomoki Sempokuya2, Passisd Laoveeravat3, Patompong Ungprasert4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cecal intubation time (CIT) is an indicator for difficult colonoscopy which is associated with patients' unpleasant experience as well as increased risk of complications. Several studies have attempted to identify predictors for prolonged CIT but those studies tended to be small which gave rise to inconsistent and underpowered results. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to summarize all available data.
METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched through November 2017 for studies that investigated the factors for prolonged CIT. Only factors that were reported by at least three studies were included in the meta-analyses. Pooled mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using random effects model. The between-study heterogeneity of effect size was quantified using the Q statistic and I2.
RESULTS: A total of nine studies involving 7131 patients were included. A total of six factors were analyzed. Patients with older age (≥ 65 versus < 65), female sex (versus male), low body mass index (BMI) (< 25 versus ≥ 25 kg/m2), and poor bowel preparation (versus fair to good) had significantly longer CIT. The presence of diverticulosis and prior abdominal surgery were not significantly associated with prolonged CIT.
CONCLUSIONS: The current meta-analyses have demonstrated that old age, female sex, low BMI, and poor bowel preparation were the predictors for prolonged CIT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cecal intubation time; Difficult colonoscopy; Meta-analysis; Risk factors

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29520457     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-018-3014-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  35 in total

1.  Endoscopic colorectal cancer screening in women: can we do better?

Authors:  Sarah E Streett
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 2.  The difficult colonoscopy.

Authors:  Todd N Witte; Robert Enns
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.522

3.  Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy: thinner is not always better.

Authors:  J C Anderson; J D Gonzalez; C R Messina; B J Pollack
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Prone positioning of obese patients for colonoscopy results in shortened cecal intubation times: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Fatema S Uddin; Ramiz Iqbal; William V Harford; Kerry B Dunbar; Byron L Cryer; Stuart J Spechler; Linda A Feagins
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Factors predictive of difficult colonoscopy.

Authors:  J C Anderson; C R Messina; W Cohn; E Gottfried; S Ingber; G Bernstein; E Coman; J Polito
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Factors that predict cecal insertion time during sedated colonoscopy: the role of waist circumference.

Authors:  Yu-Hsi Hsieh; Chin-Sung Kuo; Kuo-Chih Tseng; Hwai-Jeng Lin
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.029

7.  Body mass index predicts cecal insertion time: the higher, the better.

Authors:  Prashant Krishnan; Aijaz Ahmed Sofi; Robert Dempsey; Osama Alaradi; Ali Nawras
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2012-04-08       Impact factor: 7.559

8.  Impact factors for difficult cecal intubation during colonoscopy.

Authors:  Chih-Ming Liang; Yi-Chun Chiu; Keng-Liang Wu; William Tam; Wei-Chen Tai; Ming-Luen Hu; Yeh-Pin Chou; King-Wah Chiu; Seng-Kee Chuah
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.719

Review 9.  Colonoscopy Reduces Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Patients With Non-Malignant Findings: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jun Pan; Lei Xin; Yi-Fei Ma; Liang-Hao Hu; Zhao-Shen Li
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Complete colonoscopy: impact of patients' demographics and anthropometry on caecal intubation time.

Authors:  Adegboyega Akere; Jesse Abiodun Otegbayo
Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-04-07
View more
  5 in total

1.  Predictive factors of inadequate bowel preparation for elective colonoscopy.

Authors:  Amir Sadeghi; Mohsen Rajabnia; Mohammad Bagheri; Shaghayegh Jamshidizadeh; Samane Saberi; Paria Shahnazi; Leila Pasharavesh; Mohamad Amin Pourhoseingholi; Mona Mirzaei; Hamid Asadzadeh Aghdaei; Mohammad Reza Zali
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench       Date:  2022

2.  Cecal intubation time in screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Hyun Young Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 3.  Efficacy and safety of the starting position during colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jun Watanabe; Daeho Park; Eiichi Kakehi; Kazuoki Inoue; Shizukiyo Ishikawa; Yuki Kataoka
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2020-06-16

4.  Factors Affecting Cecal Intubation Time in Colonoscopy: Impact of Obesity.

Authors:  Beslen Goksoy; Mevlut Kiyak; Mehmet Karadag; Gokhan Yilmaz; Ibrahim F Azamat
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-05-31

5.  A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of the addition of lubiprostone to bowel preparation before colonoscopy.

Authors:  Peng Li; Xue-Qian He; Jie Dong; Jing Du
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.