Literature DB >> 22678462

Factors affecting colonoscope insertion time in patients with or without a colostomy after left-sided colorectal resection.

Hui Won Jang1, Yoon Nam Kim, Chung Mo Nam, Hyun Jung Lee, Soo Jung Park, Sung Pil Hong, Tae Il Kim, Won Ho Kim, Jae Hee Cheon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We examined whether the insertion time for colonoscopies performed after left-sided resection was different in patients with a colostomy from that in patients without a colostomy and identified factors that could impact colonoscopy performance.
METHODS: We included consecutive patients who underwent colonoscopy between July 2005 and March 2011 after left-sided colorectal resection for colorectal cancer. We classified surgical methods according to the presence or absence of a colostomy and evaluated colonoscope insertion time retrospectively. Furthermore, we analyzed factors that might affect insertion time.
RESULTS: A total of 1,041 patients underwent colonoscopy after left-sided colorectal resection during the study period. The colonoscopy completion rate was 98.6 %, and the mean insertion time was 6.1 ± 4.6 min (median 4.7 min, range 0.3-35.8 min). A shorter resection length of colon, the presence of a colostomy, and a lower endoscopist case volume were found to be independent factors associated with prolonged insertion time in patients with left-sided colorectal resection. Among experienced colonoscopists, no colonoscopy-associated or clinical factors were found to affect insertion time. However, a shorter resection length of colon, the presence of a colostomy, and poor bowel preparation were associated with prolonged insertion time among inexperienced endoscopists.
CONCLUSIONS: We identified three factors that affect colonoscope insertion time after left-sided colorectal resection, including the presence of a colostomy. Inexperienced endoscopists were much more affected by the presence of a colostomy after left-sided colorectal resection. These findings have implications for the practice and teaching of colonoscopy after left-sided colorectal resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22678462     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-012-2257-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  21 in total

1.  Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer.

Authors:  E Kapiteijn; C A Marijnen; I D Nagtegaal; H Putter; W H Steup; T Wiggers; H J Rutten; L Pahlman; B Glimelius; J H van Krieken; J W Leer; C J van de Velde
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-08-30       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Value of a follow-up study of recurrent carcinoma of the colon and rectum.

Authors:  C A Ekman; J Gustavson; A Henning
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1977-12

3.  Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy: thinner is not always better.

Authors:  J C Anderson; J D Gonzalez; C R Messina; B J Pollack
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Factors affecting insertion time for colonoscopy performed under intramuscular analgesia in patients with history of colorectal resection.

Authors:  Hui Won Jang; Jae Hee Cheon; Chung Mo Nam; Chang Mo Moon; Jin Ha Lee; Soung Min Jeon; Jae Jun Park; Tae Il Kim; Won Ho Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Factors affecting insertion time and patient discomfort during colonoscopy.

Authors:  W H Kim; Y J Cho; J Y Park; P K Min; J K Kang; I S Park
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Factors predictive of difficult colonoscopy.

Authors:  J C Anderson; C R Messina; W Cohn; E Gottfried; S Ingber; G Bernstein; E Coman; J Polito
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Colonoscopy in ostomy patients. Results at the first postoperative examination.

Authors:  L Zilli; M Pietroiusti; L Bertario
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Colon cancer in France: evidence for improvement in management and survival.

Authors:  C Faivre-Finn; A-M Bouvier-Benhamiche; J M Phelip; S Manfredi; V Dancourt; J Faivre
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Does methodic long-term follow-up affect survival after curative resection of colorectal carcinoma?

Authors:  B Böhm; W Schwenk; H P Hucke; W Stock
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.

Authors:  S J Winawer; A G Zauber; M N Ho; M J O'Brien; L S Gottlieb; S S Sternberg; J D Waye; M Schapiro; J H Bond; J F Panish
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  2 in total

1.  Direct inpatient costs and influencing factors for patients with rectal cancer with low anterior resection: a retrospective observational study at a three-tertiary hospital in Beijing, China.

Authors:  Zhishui Chen; Jiahua Leng; Guangying Gao; Lianhai Zhang; Yang Yang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  A Retrospective Case-Control Study Evaluating the Bowel Preparation Quality during Surveillance Colonoscopy after Colonic Resection.

Authors:  Stefano Pontone; Giovanni Leonetti; Antonietta Lamazza; Fausto Fiocca; Angelo Filippini; Gianfranco Fanello; Fabrizio Cereatti; Enrico Fiori; Rita Angelini; Gregorio Patrizi; Manuela Brighi; Simone Vetere; Angelo Antoniozzi; Daniele Pironi; Simone Manfredelli; Paolo Pontone
Journal:  ISRN Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.