Literature DB >> 27289590

Detailed quantitative assessment of colonic morphology at CT colonography using novel software: a feasibility and reproducibility study.

Charles N Weber1, Anna S Lev-Toaff2, Marc S Levine2, Sandra Sudarsky3, Lutz Guendel4, Bernhard Geiger3, Hanna M Zafar2.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility and reproducibility of quantitative assessment of colonic morphology on CT colonography (CTC). CTC datasets from 60 patients with optimal colonic distension were assessed using prototype software. Metrics potentially associated with poor endoscopic performance were calculated for the total colon and each segment including: length, volume, tortuosity (number of high curvature points <90°), and compactness (volume of box containing centerline divided by centerline length). Sigmoid apex height relative to the lumbosacral junction was also measured. Datasets were quantified twice each, and intra-reader reliability was evaluated using concordance correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman plot. Complete quantitative datasets including the five proposed metrics were generated from 58 of 60 (97 %) CTC examinations. The sigmoid and transverse segments were the longest (55.9 and 51.4 cm), had the largest volumes (0.410 and 0.609 L), and were the most tortuous (3.39 and 2.75 high curvature points) and least compact (3347 and 3595 mm2), noting high inter-patient variability for all metrics. Mean height of the sigmoid apex was 6.7 cm, also with high inter-patient variability (SD 6.8 cm). Intra-reader reliability was high for total and segmental lengths and sigmoid apex height (CCC = 0.9991) with excellent repeatability coefficient (CR = 3.0-3.3). There was low percent variance of metrics dependent upon length (median 5 %). Detailed automated quantitative assessment of colonic morphology on routine CTC datasets is feasible and reproducible, requiring minimal reader interaction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT colonography; Colonic morphology; Feasibility and reproducibility; Quantitative assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27289590     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-016-1529-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  26 in total

1.  A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility.

Authors:  L I Lin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Prospective evaluation of factors predicting difficulty and pain during sedation-free colonoscopy.

Authors:  Yuuichi Takahashi; Hideaki Tanaka; Mitsuyo Kinjo; Ken Sakumoto
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Can barium enema indicate when colonoscopy will be difficult?

Authors:  B P Saunders; S Halligan; C Jobling; M Fukumoto; M E Moussa; C B Williams; C I Bartram
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.350

4.  Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy: thinner is not always better.

Authors:  J C Anderson; J D Gonzalez; C R Messina; B J Pollack
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Patient pain during colonoscopy: an analysis using real-time magnetic endoscope imaging.

Authors:  S G Shah; J C Brooker; C Thapar; C B Williams; B P Saunders
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  Factors predictive of difficult colonoscopy.

Authors:  J C Anderson; C R Messina; W Cohn; E Gottfried; S Ingber; G Bernstein; E Coman; J Polito
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Factors that predict cecal insertion time during sedated colonoscopy: the role of waist circumference.

Authors:  Yu-Hsi Hsieh; Chin-Sung Kuo; Kuo-Chih Tseng; Hwai-Jeng Lin
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.029

8.  Technical performance of colonoscopy: the key role of sedation/analgesia and other quality indicators.

Authors:  Franco Radaelli; Gianmichele Meucci; Giusy Sgroi; Giorgio Minoli
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Effect of hysterectomy status on polyp detection rates at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  Clare Adams; Christopher Cardwell; Claire Cook; Robert Edwards; Wendy S Atkin; Dion G Morton
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  The case for using the repeatability coefficient when calculating test-retest reliability.

Authors:  Sharmila Vaz; Torbjörn Falkmer; Anne Elizabeth Passmore; Richard Parsons; Pantelis Andreou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.