Literature DB >> 17909764

Multisensory integration affects ERP components elicited by exogenous cues.

Valerio Santangelo1, Rob H J Van der Lubbe, Marta Olivetti Belardinelli, Albert Postma.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that the amplitude of event related brain potentials (ERPs) elicited by a combined audiovisual stimulus is larger than the sum of a single auditory and visual stimulus. This enlargement is thought to reflect multisensory integration. Based on these data, it may be hypothesized that the speeding up of responses, due to exogenous orienting effects induced by bimodal cues, exceeds the sum of single unimodal cues. Behavioral data, however, typically revealed no increased orienting effect following bimodal as compared to unimodal cues, which could be due to a failure of multisensory integration of the cues. To examine this possibility, we computed ERPs elicited by both bimodal (audiovisual) and unimodal (either auditory or visual) cues, and determined their exogenous orienting effects on responses to a to-be-discriminated visual target. Interestingly, the posterior P1 component elicited by bimodal cues was larger than the sum of the P1 components elicited by a single auditory and visual cue (i.e., a superadditive effect), but no enhanced orienting effect was found on response speed. The latter result suggests that multisensory integration elicited by our bimodal cues plays no special role for spatial orienting, at least in the present setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17909764     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1151-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  27 in total

1.  The ventriloquist effect does not depend on the direction of deliberate visual attention.

Authors:  P Bertelson; J Vroomen; B de Gelder; J Driver
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-02

2.  Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging of crossmodal binding in the human heteromodal cortex.

Authors:  G A Calvert; R Campbell; M J Brammer
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Multisensory integration and crossmodal attention effects in the human brain.

Authors:  J J McDonald; W A Teder-Sälejärvi; L M Ward
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-06-08       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Unraveling multisensory integration: patchy organization within human STS multisensory cortex.

Authors:  Michael S Beauchamp; Brenna D Argall; Jerzy Bodurka; Jeff H Duyn; Alex Martin
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-10-10       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Competition between endogenous and exogenous orienting of visual attention.

Authors:  Andrea Berger; Avishai Henik; Robert Rafal
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-05

6.  Multisensory processing and oscillatory gamma responses: effects of spatial selective attention.

Authors:  Daniel Senkowski; Durk Talsma; Christoph S Herrmann; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Multisensory integration for timing engages different brain networks.

Authors:  Mukeshwar Dhamala; Collins G Assisi; Viktor K Jirsa; Fred L Steinberg; J A Scott Kelso
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  The ventriloquist effect does not depend on the direction of automatic visual attention.

Authors:  J Vroomen; P Bertelson; B de Gelder
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-05

9.  Spatial attention triggered by unimodal, crossmodal, and bimodal exogenous cues: a comparison of reflexive orienting mechanisms.

Authors:  Valerio Santangelo; Rob H J Van der Lubbe; Marta Olivetti Belardinelli; Albert Postma
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-18       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The visually responsive neuron and beyond: multisensory integration in cat and monkey.

Authors:  B E Stein; M A Meredith; M T Wallace
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.453

View more
  16 in total

1.  The processing of visual and auditory information for reaching movements.

Authors:  Cheryl M Glazebrook; Timothy N Welsh; Luc Tremblay
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-08-08

2.  Competition between auditory and visual spatial cues during visual task performance.

Authors:  Thomas Koelewijn; Adelbert Bronkhorst; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Neural correlates of intersensory processing in 5-month-old infants.

Authors:  Greg D Reynolds; Lorraine E Bahrick; Robert Lickliter; Maggie W Guy
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 3.038

4.  Sensory information in perceptual-motor sequence learning: visual and/or tactile stimuli.

Authors:  Elger L Abrahamse; Rob H J van der Lubbe; Willem B Verwey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  The interactions of multisensory integration with endogenous and exogenous attention.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Tang; Jinglong Wu; Yong Shen
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  Exogenous Bimodal Cues Attenuate Age-Related Audiovisual Integration.

Authors:  Yanna Ren; Ying Zhang; Yawei Hou; Junyuan Li; Junhao Bi; Weiping Yang
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2021-05-27

7.  Short-Term Audiovisual Spatial Training Enhances Electrophysiological Correlates of Auditory Selective Spatial Attention.

Authors:  Christina Hanenberg; Michael-Christian Schlüter; Stephan Getzmann; Jörg Lewald
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Evidence for multisensory integration in the elicitation of prior entry by bimodal cues.

Authors:  Doug J K Barrett; Katrin Krumbholz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Crossmodal semantic congruence can affect visuo-spatial processing and activity of the fronto-parietal attention networks.

Authors:  Serena Mastroberardino; Valerio Santangelo; Emiliano Macaluso
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-10

10.  Do audio-visual motion cues promote segregation of auditory streams?

Authors:  Lidia Shestopalova; Tamás M Bőhm; Alexandra Bendixen; Andreas G Andreou; Julius Georgiou; Guillaume Garreau; Botond Hajdu; Susan L Denham; István Winkler
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.