Literature DB >> 17306232

Visual cues can modulate integration and segregation of objects in auditory scene analysis.

Torsten Rahne1, Martin Böckmann, Hellmut von Specht, Elyse S Sussman.   

Abstract

The task of assigning concurrent sounds to different auditory objects is known to depend on temporal and spectral cues. When tones of high and low frequencies are presented in alternation, they can be perceived as a single, integrated melody, or as two parallel, segregated melodic lines, according to the presentation rate and frequency distance between the sounds. At an intermediate distance, in the 'ambiguous' range, both percepts are possible. We conducted an electrophysiological experiment to determine whether an ambiguous sound organization could be modulated toward an integrated or segregated percept by the synchronous presentation of visual cues. Two sets of sounds (one high frequency and one low frequency) were interleaved. To promote integration or segregation, visual stimuli were synchronized to either the within-set frequency pattern or to the across-set intensity pattern. Elicitation of the mismatch negativity (MMN) component of event-related brain potentials was used to index the segregated organization, when no task was performed with the sounds. MMN was elicited only when the visual pattern promoted the segregation of the sounds. The results demonstrate cross-modal effects on auditory object perception in that sound ambiguity was resolved by synchronous presentation of visual stimuli, which promoted either an integrated or segregated perception of the sounds.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17306232      PMCID: PMC1885229          DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.01.074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  28 in total

1.  Illusions. What you see is what you hear.

Authors:  L Shams; Y Kamitani; S Shimojo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-12-14       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Organizing sound sequences in the human brain: the interplay of auditory streaming and temporal integration.

Authors:  H Yabe; I Winkler; I Czigler; S Koyama; R Kakigi; T Sutoh; T Hiruma; S Kaneko
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2001-04-06       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  The ventriloquist effect does not depend on the direction of deliberate visual attention.

Authors:  P Bertelson; J Vroomen; B de Gelder; J Driver
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-02

4.  When sound affects vision: effects of auditory grouping on visual motion perception.

Authors:  K Watanabe; S Shimojo
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-03

Review 5.  "Primitive intelligence" in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  R Näätänen; M Tervaniemi; E Sussman; P Paavilainen; I Winkler
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 6.  Multisensory integration: perceptual grouping by eye and ear.

Authors:  A J King; G A Calvert
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Dynamics of cortico-subcortical cross-modal operations involved in audio-visual object detection in humans.

Authors:  Alexandra Fort; Claude Delpuech; Jacques Pernier; Marie-Hélène Giard
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Preattentively grouped tones do not elicit MMN with respect to each other.

Authors:  Walter Ritter; Pierfilippo De Sanctis; Sophie Molholm; Daniel C Javitt; John J Foxe
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  The ventriloquist effect does not depend on the direction of automatic visual attention.

Authors:  J Vroomen; P Bertelson; B de Gelder
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-05

10.  The development of the perceptual organization of sound by frequency separation in 5-11-year-old children.

Authors:  E Sussman; R Wong; J Horváth; I Winkler; W Wang
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-01-20       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  17 in total

1.  Auditory stream segregation in children with Asperger syndrome.

Authors:  T Lepistö; A Kuitunen; E Sussman; S Saalasti; E Jansson-Verkasalo; T Nieminen-von Wendt; T Kujala
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2009-09-12       Impact factor: 3.251

2.  Changes of Effective Connectivity in the Alpha Band Characterize Differential Processing of Audiovisual Information in Cross-Modal Selective Attention.

Authors:  Weikun Niu; Yuying Jiang; Xin Zhang; Tianzi Jiang; Yujin Zhang; Shan Yu
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2020-07-26       Impact factor: 5.203

Review 3.  The five myths of MMN: redefining how to use MMN in basic and clinical research.

Authors:  E S Sussman; S Chen; J Sussman-Fort; E Dinces
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  The effect of lip-reading on primary stream segregation.

Authors:  Aymeric Devergie; Nicolas Grimault; Etienne Gaudrain; Eric W Healy; Frédéric Berthommier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The effect of visual cues on auditory stream segregation in musicians and non-musicians.

Authors:  Jeremy Marozeau; Hamish Innes-Brown; David B Grayden; Anthony N Burkitt; Peter J Blamey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Neural representations of auditory input accommodate to the context in a dynamically changing acoustic environment.

Authors:  Torsten Rahne; Elyse Sussman
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Effects of task-switching on neural representations of ambiguous sound input.

Authors:  Elyse S Sussman; Albert S Bregman; Wei-Wei Lee
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 8.  Mismatch negativity (MMN) as an index of cognitive dysfunction.

Authors:  Risto Näätänen; Elyse S Sussman; Dean Salisbury; Valerie L Shafer
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 3.020

9.  Attention Matters: Pitch vs. Pattern Processing in Adolescence.

Authors:  Elyse S Sussman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-06-10

10.  The human brain maintains contradictory and redundant auditory sensory predictions.

Authors:  Marika Pieszek; Andreas Widmann; Thomas Gruber; Erich Schröger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.