Literature DB >> 12467089

Is cross-modal integration of emotional expressions independent of attentional resources?

J Vroomen1, J Driver, B de Gelder.   

Abstract

In this study, we examined whether integration of visual and auditory information about emotions requires limited attentional resources. Subjects judged whether a voice expressed happiness or fear, while trying to ignore a concurrently presented static facial expression. As an additional task, the subjects had to add two numbers together rapidly (Experiment 1), count the occurrences of a target digit in a rapid serial visual presentation (Experiment 2), or judge the pitch of a tone as high or low (Experiment 3). The visible face had an impact on judgments of the emotion of the heard voice in all the experiments. This cross-modal effect was independent of whether or not the subjects performed a demanding additional task. This suggests that integration of visual and auditory information about emotions may be a mandatory process, unconstrained by attentional resources.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 12467089     DOI: 10.3758/cabn.1.4.382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  17 in total

1.  The ventriloquist effect does not depend on the direction of deliberate visual attention.

Authors:  P Bertelson; J Vroomen; B de Gelder; J Driver
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-02

2.  Non-conscious recognition of affect in the absence of striate cortex.

Authors:  B de Gelder; J Vroomen; G Pourtois; L Weiskrantz
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1999-12-16       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Unseen stimuli modulate conscious visual experience: evidence from inter-hemispheric summation.

Authors:  B de Gelder; G Pourtois; M van Raamsdonk; J Vroomen; L Weiskrantz
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-02-12       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  Differential extrageniculostriate and amygdala responses to presentation of emotional faces in a cortically blind field.

Authors:  J S Morris; B DeGelder; L Weiskrantz; R J Dolan
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Hearing lips and seeing voices.

Authors:  H McGurk; J MacDonald
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976 Dec 23-30       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The ventriloquist effect does not depend on the direction of automatic visual attention.

Authors:  J Vroomen; P Bertelson; B de Gelder
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-05

7.  A subcortical pathway to the right amygdala mediating "unseen" fear.

Authors:  J S Morris; A Ohman; R J Dolan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-02-16       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention.

Authors:  N Lavie
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Enhancement of selective listening by illusory mislocation of speech sounds due to lip-reading.

Authors:  J Driver
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-05-02       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Ventriloquism in patients with unilateral visual neglect.

Authors:  P Bertelson; F Pavani; E Ladavas; J Vroomen
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  33 in total

1.  Fear recognition in the voice is modulated by unconsciously recognized facial expressions but not by unconsciously recognized affective pictures.

Authors:  Beatrice de Gelder; Gilles Pourtois; Lawrence Weiskrantz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Contextual influences of emotional speech prosody on face processing: how much is enough?

Authors:  Silke Paulmann; Marc D Pell
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Cross-modal perceptual load: the impact of modality and individual differences.

Authors:  Rajwant Sandhu; Benjamin James Dyson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  EEG gamma-band activity in rapid serial visual presentation.

Authors:  Cornelia Kranczioch; Stefan Debener; Christoph S Herrmann; Andreas K Engel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Unconscious fear influences emotional awareness of faces and voices.

Authors:  B de Gelder; J S Morris; R J Dolan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-13       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Impact of voice on emotional judgment of faces: an event-related fMRI study.

Authors:  Thomas Ethofer; Silke Anders; Michael Erb; Christina Droll; Lydia Royen; Ralf Saur; Susanne Reiterer; Wolfgang Grodd; Dirk Wildgruber
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Attention to touch weakens audiovisual speech integration.

Authors:  Agnès Alsius; Jordi Navarra; Salvador Soto-Faraco
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Phonetic recalibration does not depend on working memory.

Authors:  Martijn Baart; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Top-down and bottom-up modulation in processing bimodal face/voice stimuli.

Authors:  Marianne Latinus; Rufin VanRullen; Margot J Taylor
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  Association of trait emotional intelligence and individual fMRI-activation patterns during the perception of social signals from voice and face.

Authors:  Benjamin Kreifelts; Thomas Ethofer; Elisabeth Huberle; Wolfgang Grodd; Dirk Wildgruber
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.