Literature DB >> 10693683

Composite liver--small bowel allografts with preservation of donor duodenum and hepatic biliary system in children.

J Bueno1, K Abu-Elmagd, G Mazariegos, J Madariaga, J Fung, J Reyes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
PURPOSE: Liver and intestinal transplantation is commonly required for children with intestinal failure who suffer concomitant total parenteral nutrition (TPN)-induced liver failure. Retrieval of such composite allografts using previously described "standard techniques" mandates reconstruction of the biliary system with a defunctionalization loop of the proximal allograft jejunum. The occasional posttransplant biliary complications have been associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Also, size matching has limited the pool of donor organs for this patient population. To improve outcome and increase the donor pool the authors have utilized a duodenal-sparing composite liver small bowel allograft technique (DLSBTx) by preserving the head of the pancreas and the pancreatic-duodenal arteries. This precludes a biliary drainage procedure.
METHODS: Nine children (5 girls, 4 boys), with a mean age of 1.4 years (range, 1 to 17.4 years) received a DLSBTx. In 2 patients the liver was reduced; 1 patient received the whole pancreas. The mean recipient weight at the time of transplantation was 17.4 kg (range, 6.6 to 49.8 kg). The mean age and mean weight for donors was 7.9 years (range, 3 days to 22 years) and 25 kg (range, 4 to 70 kg), respectively. All transplants were performed under tacrolimus and steroid immunosuppression.
RESULTS: With a mean follow-up of 419 days (range, 5 to 795 days), patient and graft survival rates are 78% and 67%, respectively. One patient underwent a combined retransplantation with the standard technique 31 days after the primary allograft was destroyed by a native pancreatic fistula. Currently, all surviving recipients are at home and off TPN. DLSBTx allowed the expansion of the donor pool by transplanting 6 patients with donor to recipient weight ratio > or =1 and utilizing 2 less than 5-kg donors, including a neonatal donor. In 55% of the patients, chemical pancreatitis was observed during the early postoperative period. None of the duodenal allografts experienced signs of ischemia or leak.
CONCLUSIONS: The technical advantages of this procedure include avoidance of a biliary reconstruction and simplification of the operative procedure. This, together with the feasibility of split or reduced liver grafting promises to increase the donor pool from neonates to adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10693683     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3468(00)90027-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  11 in total

Review 1.  Small intestinal transplantation.

Authors:  E M Quigley
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2001-10

2.  Modified technique for combined liver-small bowel transplantation in pigs.

Authors:  Zhen-Yu Yin; Xiao-Dong Ni; Feng Jiang; Ning Li; You-Sheng Li; Jie-Shou Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Auxiliary en-bloc liver-small bowel transplantation with partial pancreas preservation in pigs.

Authors:  Zhen-Yu Yin; Xiao-Dong Ni; Feng Jiang; Ning Li; You-Sheng Li; Xiao-Ming Wang; Jie-Shou Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Modifications in combined liver-small bowel transplantation in pigs.

Authors:  Feng Jiang; Zhen-Yu Yin; Xiao-Dong Ni; You-Sheng Li; Ning Li; Jie-Shou Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Intestinal and multivisceral transplantation in children.

Authors:  Tomoaki Kato; Andreas G Tzakis; Gennaro Selvaggi; Jeffrey J Gaynor; Andre I David; Alessandro Bussotti; Jang I Moon; Takehisa Ueno; Werviston DeFaria; Sergio Santiago; David M Levi; Seigo Nishida; Monica L Velasco; Gwen McLaughlin; Erick Hernandez; John F Thompson; Patricia Cantwell; Norman Holliday; Alan S Livingstone; Phillip Ruiz
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Clinical intestinal transplantation: a decade of experience at a single center.

Authors:  K Abu-Elmagd; J Reyes; G Bond; G Mazariegos; T Wu; N Murase; R Sindhi; D Martin; J Colangelo; M Zak; D Janson; M Ezzelarab; I Dvorchik; M Parizhskaya; M Deutsch; A Demetris; J Fung; T E Starzl
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Combined small bowel and reduced auxiliary liver transplantation: case report.

Authors:  Wei-Jie Zhang; Dun-Gui Liu; Qi-Fa Ye; Bo Sha; Fan-Jun Zhen; Hui Guo; Sui-Sheng Xia
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Modified "liver-sparing" multivisceral transplant with preserved native spleen, pancreas, and duodenum: technique and long-term outcome.

Authors:  Ruy J Cruz; Guilherme Costa; Geoffrey Bond; Kyle Soltys; William C Stein; Guosheng Wu; Lillian Martin; Darlene Koritsky; John McMichael; Rakesh Sindhi; George Mazariegos; Kareem M Abu-Elmagd
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Intestinal transplantation in children: a summary of clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in 108 patients from a single center.

Authors:  Tomoaki Kato; Jeffrey J Gaynor; Genarro Selvaggi; Naveen Mittal; John Thompson; Gwenn E McLaughlin; Seigo Nishida; Jang Moon; David Levi; Juan Madariaga; Phillip Ruiz; Andreas Tzakis
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 10.  Current perspectives on pediatric intestinal transplantation.

Authors:  George V Mazariegos; Robert H Squires; Rakesh K Sindhi
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2009-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.