Literature DB >> 12970921

Modifications in combined liver-small bowel transplantation in pigs.

Feng Jiang1, Zhen-Yu Yin, Xiao-Dong Ni, You-Sheng Li, Ning Li, Jie-Shou Li.   

Abstract

AIM: To introduce combined liver-small bowel transplantation in pigs.
METHODS: Eighteen transplantations in 36 large white pigs were performed. Three modifications in combined liver-small bowel transplantation model were applied: Veno-venous bypass was not used. Preservation of the donor duodenum and head of pancreas in continuity with the combined graft to avoid biliary reconstruction. The splenic vein of donor was anastomosed end-to-end with the portal vein of recipients by the formation of a "cuff".
RESULTS: Without immunosuppressive therapy, 72-hour survival rate of the transplanted animals was 72 % (13/18). Five of 18 pigs operated died of respiratory failure (3 cases) and bleeding during hepatectomy (2 cases). The longest survival time of animals was 6 days.
CONCLUSION: Our surgical modifications are feasible and reliable, which have made the transplantation in pigs simpler and less aggressive, and thus these can be used for preclinical study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12970921      PMCID: PMC4656689          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i9.2125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  27 in total

1.  Graft failure in two multivisceral transplant recipients secondary to necrotizing enterocolitis.

Authors:  F A Khan; T Kato; A D Pinna; M Berho; J R Nery; P Colombani; A G Tzakis
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.066

2.  Intestinal transplantation: 1997 report of the international registry. Intestinal Transplant Registry.

Authors:  D Grant
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1999-04-15       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Comparison of patterns of rejection in multivisceral transplantation and abdominal organ cluster transplantation in pigs.

Authors:  S Mitsuoka; N Tanaka; K Orita
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 1.066

4.  Small bowel transplantation under oral immunosuppression: experimental study in the pig.

Authors:  G Rossi; S Gatti; P Reggiani; D Galmarini; G Privitera; P Velio; E Melada; R Romito; L Latham; A Vannelli; M Langer; D Codazzi; P Prato; L R Fassati
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 5.  Irreversible intestinal failure, nutrition support, and small bowel transplantation.

Authors:  P Dionigi; M Alessiani; A Ferrazi
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.008

6.  Donor-specific portal blood transfusion in intestinal transplantation: a prospective, preclinical large animal study.

Authors:  R W Gruessner; R E Nakhleh; J V Harmon; M Dunning; A C Gruessner
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1998-07-27       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Intestinal transplantation in composite visceral grafts or alone.

Authors:  S Todo; A G Tzakis; K Abu-Elmagd; J Reyes; K Nakamura; A Casavilla; R Selby; B M Nour; H Wright; J J Fung
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Rejection of human intestinal allografts: alone or in combination with the liver.

Authors:  K Abu-Elmagd; S Todo; A Tzakis; H Furukawa; B Nour; J Reyes; K Nakamura; C Scotti-Foglieni; H el-Hammadi; Z Kadry
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.066

9.  Clinical features and prognosis of children assessed for isolated small bowel or combined small bowel and liver transplantation.

Authors:  S V Beath; S J Needham; D A Kelly; I W Booth; F Raafat; R G Buick; J A Buckels; A D Mayer
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.545

10.  Successful small-bowel/liver transplantation.

Authors:  D Grant; W Wall; R Mimeault; R Zhong; C Ghent; B Garcia; C Stiller; J Duff
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-01-27       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.