Literature DB >> 11524593

Clinical intestinal transplantation: a decade of experience at a single center.

K Abu-Elmagd1, J Reyes, G Bond, G Mazariegos, T Wu, N Murase, R Sindhi, D Martin, J Colangelo, M Zak, D Janson, M Ezzelarab, I Dvorchik, M Parizhskaya, M Deutsch, A Demetris, J Fung, T E Starzl.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term efficacy of intestinal transplantation under tacrolimus-based immunosuppression and the therapeutic benefit of newly developed adjunct immunosuppressants and management strategies. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: With the advent of tacrolimus in 1990, transplantation of the intestine began to emerge as therapy for intestinal failure. However, a high risk of rejection, with the consequent need for acute and chronic high-dose immunosuppression, has inhibited its widespread application.
METHODS: During an 11-year period, divided into two segments by a 1-year moratorium in 1994, 155 patients received 165 intestinal allografts under immunosuppression based on tacrolimus and prednisone: 65 intestine alone, 75 liver and intestine, and 25 multivisceral. For the transplantations since the moratorium (n = 99), an adjunct immunosuppressant (cyclophosphamide or daclizumab) was used for 74 transplantations, adjunct donor bone marrow was given in 39, and the intestine of 11 allografts was irradiated with a single dose of 750 cGy.
RESULTS: The actuarial survival rate for the total population was 75% at 1 year, 54% at 5 years, and 42% at 10 years. Recipients of liver plus intestine had the best long-term prognosis and the lowest risk of graft loss from rejection (P =.001). Since 1994, survival rates have improved. Techniques for early detection of Epstein-Barr and cytomegaloviral infections, bone marrow augmentation, the adjunct use of the interleukin-2 antagonist daclizumab, and most recently allograft irradiation may have contributed to the better results.
CONCLUSION: The survival rates after intestinal transplantation have cumulatively improved during the past decade. With the management strategies currently under evaluation, intestinal transplant procedures have the potential to become the standard of care for patients with end-stage intestinal failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11524593      PMCID: PMC1422031          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200109000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  56 in total

1.  Homotransplantation of multiple visceral organs.

Authors:  T E STARZL; H A KAUPP; D R BROCK; G W BUTZ; J W LINMAN
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1962-02       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Abdominal multivisceral transplantation.

Authors:  S Todo; A Tzakis; K Abu-Elmagd; J Reyes; H Furukawa; B Nour; J Fung; A Demetris; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1995-01-27       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Immunomodulation for intestinal transplantation by allograft irradiation, adjunct donor bone marrow infusion, or both.

Authors:  N Murase; Q Ye; M A Nalesnik; A J Demetris; K Abu-Elmagd; J Reyes; N Ichikawa; T Okuda; J J Fung; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Transplantation of multiple abdominal viscera.

Authors:  T E Starzl; M I Rowe; S Todo; R Jaffe; A Tzakis; A L Hoffman; C Esquivel; K A Porter; R Venkataramanan; L Makowka
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-03-10       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Immunohistochemical demonstration of enteric nervous distribution after syngeneic small bowel transplantation in rats.

Authors:  R Hirose; T Taguchi; Y Hirata; T Yamada; O Nada; S Suita
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Abdominal organ cluster transplantation for the treatment of upper abdominal malignancies.

Authors:  T E Starzl; S Todo; A Tzakis; L Podesta; L Mieles; A Demetris; L Teperman; R Selby; W Stevenson; A Stieber
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Current results of intestinal transplantation. The International Intestinal Transplant Registry.

Authors:  D Grant
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-06-29       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Effects of insulin, glucagon, and insuling/glucagon infusions on liver morphology and cell division after complete portacaval shunt in dogs.

Authors:  T E Starzl; K Watanabe; K A Porter; C W Putnam
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1976-04-17       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Intestinal transplantation in composite visceral grafts or alone.

Authors:  S Todo; A G Tzakis; K Abu-Elmagd; J Reyes; K Nakamura; A Casavilla; R Selby; B M Nour; H Wright; J J Fung
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Graft-versus-host disease after liver and small bowel transplantation in a child.

Authors:  J Reyes; S Todo; M Green; E Yunis; D Schoner; S Kocoshis; H Furukawa; K Abu-Elmagd; A Tzakis; J Bueno; T E Starzl
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.863

View more
  44 in total

1.  The saga of liver replacement, with particular reference to the reciprocal influence of liver and kidney transplantation (1955-1967).

Authors:  Thomas E Starzl
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Tolerogenic immunosuppression for organ transplantation.

Authors:  Thomas E Starzl; Noriko Murase; Kareem Abu-Elmagd; Edward A Gray; Ron Shapiro; Bijan Eghtesad; Robert J Corry; Mark L Jordan; Paulo Fontes; Tim Gayowski; Geoffrey Bond; Velma P Scantlebury; Santosh Potdar; Parmjeet Randhawa; Tong Wu; Adriana Zeevi; Michael A Nalesnik; Jennifer Woodward; Amadeo Marcos; Massimo Trucco; Anthony J Demetris; John J Fung
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-05-03       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Neuronal adrenergic and muscular cholinergic contractile hypersensitivity in canine jejunum after extrinsic denervation.

Authors:  Bruno M Balsiger; Chong-Liang He; Nicholas J Zyromski; Michael G Sarr
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  [Intensive care treatment following transplant surgery].

Authors:  S Kohler; A Pascher; P Neuhaus
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Postprandial augmentation of absorption of water and electrolytes in jejunum is neurally modulated: implications for segmental small bowel transplantation.

Authors:  Abdalla E Zarroug; Karen D Libsch; Scott G Houghton; Judith A Duenes; Michael G Sarr
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Pancreatic transplantation at the University of Pittsburgh.

Authors:  Ngoc L Thai; Kareem Abu-Elmagd; Akhar Khan; Geoffrey Bond; Amit Basu; Kusum Tom; George Mazariegos; Rakesh Sindhi; Jorge Reyes; Henkie P Tan; Amadeo Marcos; Thomas E Starzl; Ron Shapiro
Journal:  Clin Transpl       Date:  2004

Review 7.  Small bowel transplantation.

Authors:  Stephen J D O'Keefe; Laura Matarese
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2006-10

8.  Bacterial translocation in acute rejection after small bowel transplantation in rats.

Authors:  Y Zou; F Hernandez; E Burgos; L Martinez; S Gonzalez-Reyes; V Fernandez-Dumont; G Lopez; M Romero; M Lopez-Santamaria; J A Tovar
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2004-11-30       Impact factor: 1.827

9.  Small bowel transplantation.

Authors:  Stephen Pollard
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2004-05

10.  Using porcine small intestinal submucosa in intestinal regeneration.

Authors:  Savaş Demirbilek; Turan Kanmaz; Ilyas Ozardali; Mehmet Naci Edali; Selçuk Yücesan
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2003-10-10       Impact factor: 1.827

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.