Literature DB >> 10682343

Drug discrimination in rats under concurrent variable-interval variable-interval schedules.

D E McMillan1, W C Hardwick.   

Abstract

Eight rats were trained to discriminate pentobarbital from saline under a concurrent variable-interval (VI) VI schedule, on which responses on the pentobarbital-biased lever after pentobarbital were reinforced under VI 20 s and responses on the saline-biased lever were reinforced under VI 80 s. After saline, the reinforcement contingencies programmed on the two levers were reversed. The rats made 62.3% of their responses on the pentobarbital-biased lever after pentobarbital and 72.2% on the saline-biased lever after saline, both of which are lower than predicted by the matching law. When the schedule was changed to concurrent VI 50 s VI 50 s for test sessions with saline and the training dose of pentobarbital, responding on the pentobarbital-biased lever after the training dose of pentobarbital and on the saline-biased lever after saline became nearly equal, even during the first 2 min of the session, suggesting that the presence or absence of the training drug was exerting minimal control over responding and making the determination of dose-effect relations of drugs difficult to interpret. When the pentobarbital dose-response curve was determined under the concurrent VI 50-s VI 50-s schedule, responding was fairly evenly distributed on both levers for most rats. Therefore, 6 additional rats were trained to respond under a concurrent VI 60-s VI 240-s schedule. Under this schedule, the rats made 62.6% of their responses on the pentobarbital-biased lever after pentobarbital and 73.5% of their responses on the saline-biased lever after saline, which also is lower than the percentages predicted by perfect matching. When the schedule was changed to a concurrent VI 150-s VI 150-s schedule for 5-min test sessions with additional drugs, the presence or absence of pentobarbital continued to control responding in most rats, and it was possible to generate graded dose-response curves for pentobarbital and other drugs using the data from these 5-min sessions. The dose-response curves generated under these conditions were similar to the dose-response curves generated using other reinforcement schedules and other species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10682343      PMCID: PMC1284765          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2000.73-103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  17 in total

1.  Drug discrimination under a concurrent fixed-ratio fixed-ratio schedule.

Authors:  D E McMillan; M Li
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Effects of training history on drug discrimination under concurrent fixed-interval schedules.

Authors:  D E McMillan; M Li
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.293

3.  The time is ripe for an experimental analysis of measurement issues Commentary on Stolerman "Measurement issues in drug discrimination"

Authors:  A.M. Young
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.293

4.  Maximizing and matching on concurrent ratio schedules.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein; D H Loveland
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Drug discrimination under a concurrent fixed-interval fixed-interval schedule.

Authors:  D E McMillan; M Li; W C Hardwick
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Kinetics of matching.

Authors:  T A Mark; C R Gallistel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1994-01

8.  Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Pentobarbital-like discriminative stimulus effects of N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists.

Authors:  J Willetts; R L Balster
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.030

10.  Drug discrimination under a concurrent schedule.

Authors:  S H Snodgrass; D E McMillan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  4 in total

1.  The role of dopamine in reinforcement: changes in reinforcement sensitivity induced by D1-type, D2-type, and nonselective dopamine receptor agonists.

Authors:  Natalie A Bratcher; Valeri Farmer-Dougan; James D Dougan; Byron A Heidenreich; Paul A Garris
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Drug discrimination under two concurrent fixed-interval fixed-interval schedules.

Authors:  D E McMillan; M Li
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Navigation in the Morris swim task as a baseline for drug discrimination: a demonstration with morphine.

Authors:  David Ziegler; Julian R Keith; Raymond C Pitts; Mark Galizio
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  5-HT1a Receptor Involvement in Temporal Memory and the Response to Temporal Ambiguity.

Authors:  Zvi R Shapiro; Samantha Cerasiello; Loryn Hartshorne; Matthew S Matell
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 4.677

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.