Literature DB >> 16596971

The role of dopamine in reinforcement: changes in reinforcement sensitivity induced by D1-type, D2-type, and nonselective dopamine receptor agonists.

Natalie A Bratcher1, Valeri Farmer-Dougan, James D Dougan, Byron A Heidenreich, Paul A Garris.   

Abstract

Dose-dependent changes in sensitivity to reinforcement were found when rats were treated with low, moderate, and high doses of the partial dopamine D1-type receptor agonist SKF38393 and with the nonselective dopamine agonist apomorphine, but did not change when rats were treated with similar doses of the selective dopamine D2-type receptor agonist quinpirole. Estimates of bias did not differ significantly across exposure to SKF38393 or quinpirole, but did change significantly at the high dose of apomorphine. Estimates of goodness of fit (r2) did not change significantly during quinpirole exposure. Poor goodness of fit was obtained for the high doses of SKF38393 and apomorphine. Decrements in absolute rates of responding were observed at the high dose of quinpirole and at the moderate and high doses of SKF38393 and apomorphine. Changes in r2 and absolute responding may be due to increases in stereotyped behavior during SKF38393 and apomorphine exposure that, in contrast to quinpirole, were distant from the response lever. The present data provide evidence that sensitivity to reward is affected more strongly by dopamine D1-like receptors rather than D2-like receptors, consistent with evidence from other studies investigating consummatory dopamine behavior and the tonic/phasic dopamine hypothesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16596971      PMCID: PMC1389773          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2005.82-04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  39 in total

1.  Locomotion induced by non-contingent intracranial stimulation: comparison to psychomotor stimulant.

Authors:  Valeri Farmer-Dougan; James D Dougan; Sandra Rokosik; Julie Lewis; Paul A Garris
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 1.777

2.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Regional and temporal differences in real-time dopamine efflux in the nucleus accumbens during free-choice novelty.

Authors:  G V Rebec; J R Christensen; C Guerra; M T Bardo
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1997-11-21       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 4.  A neural substrate of prediction and reward.

Authors:  W Schultz; P Dayan; P R Montague
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Drug discrimination in rats under concurrent variable-interval variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  D E McMillan; W C Hardwick
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Concurrent variable-interval drug self-administration and the generalized matching law: a drug-class comparison.

Authors:  K G Anderson; W L Woolverton
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.293

7.  Differential effects of D1 and D2 dopamine agonists on stereotyped locomotion in rats.

Authors:  D Eilam; K V Clements; H Szechtman
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1991-11-26       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Ethanol consumption and the matching law: a choice analysis using a limited-access paradigm.

Authors:  M P Martinetti; M E Andrzejewski; P N Hineline; M J Lewis
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.157

9.  Dissociation of dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens from intracranial self-stimulation.

Authors:  P A Garris; M Kilpatrick; M A Bunin; D Michael; Q D Walker; R M Wightman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-03-04       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Disappearance of hoarding behavior after 6-hydroxydopamine lesions of the mesolimbic dopamine neurons and its reinstatement with L-dopa.

Authors:  A E Kelley; L Stinus
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 1.912

View more
  6 in total

1.  Clomipramine, but not haloperidol or aripiprazole, inhibits quinpirole-induced water contrafreeloading, a putative animal model of compulsive behavior.

Authors:  Lorenza De Carolis; Chiara Schepisi; Michele S Milella; Paolo Nencini
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Apomorphine effects on frog locomotor behavior.

Authors:  Joanne Chu; Walter Wilczynski
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-02-08

3.  Effects of the 5HT2C antagonist SB242084 on the pramipexole-induced potentiation of water contrafreeloading, a putative animal model of compulsive behavior.

Authors:  Chiara Schepisi; Lorenza De Carolis; Paolo Nencini
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  The influence of cost manipulation on water contrafreeloading induced by repeated exposure to quinpirole in the rat.

Authors:  Michele S Milella; Davide Amato; Aldo Badiani; Paolo Nencini
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-01-12       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 5.  Animal models of obsessive-compulsive disorder: utility and limitations.

Authors:  Pino Alonso; Clara López-Solà; Eva Real; Cinto Segalàs; José Manuel Menchón
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 2.570

6.  Altered dopaminergic regulation of the dorsal striatum is able to induce tic-like movements in juvenile rats.

Authors:  Ester Nespoli; Francesca Rizzo; Tobias Boeckers; Ulrike Schulze; Bastian Hengerer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.