Literature DB >> 9335138

Drug discrimination under a concurrent fixed-interval fixed-interval schedule.

D E McMillan1, M Li, W C Hardwick.   

Abstract

Pigeons were trained to discriminate 5.0 mg/kg pentobarbital from saline under a concurrent fixed-interval (FI) FI schedule of food presentation on which, after pentobarbital administration, responses on one key were reinforced with food under an FI 60-s component and responses on the other key were reinforced under an FI 240-s component. After saline administration, the schedule contingencies on the two keys were reversed. After both pentobarbital and saline, pigeons responded more frequently on the key on which responses had been programmed to produce the reinforcer under the FI 60 component of the concurrent schedule. The schedule was changed to concurrent FI 150 FI 150 s for drug-substitution tests. In each bird, increasing doses of pentobarbital, ethanol, and chlordiazepoxide produced increases in the proportion of responses on the key on which responses had been reinforced under the FI 60 component after pentobarbital administration during training sessions. The proportion of responses on that key was slightly lower for ethanol than for chlordiazepoxide and pentobarbital. At a dose of pentobarbital higher than the training dose, responding decreased on the key that had been reinforced under the FI 60 component during training sessions. Phencyclidine produced less responding on the key programmed under the FI 60-s component than did pentobarbital. Methamphetamine produced responding primarily on the key on which responses had been reinforced under the FI 60-s component after saline administration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9335138      PMCID: PMC1284622          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1997.68-193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  19 in total

1.  Measures of stimulus generalization in drug discrimination experiments.

Authors:  I.P. Stoleman
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.293

2.  The time is ripe for an experimental analysis of measurement issues Commentary on Stolerman "Measurement issues in drug discrimination"

Authors:  A.M. Young
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.293

3.  Discriminative-stimulus control by morphine in the pigeon under a fixed-interval schedule of reinforcement.

Authors:  B.W. Massey; D.E. McMillan; W.D. Wessinger
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 2.293

4.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 5.  Quantal vs. graded generalization in drug discrimination: measuring a graded response.

Authors:  D A Mathis; M W Emmett-Oglesby
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  Discriminative stimulus properties of d-amphetamine-pentobarbital combinations.

Authors:  J M Witkin; R B Carter; L A Dykstra
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Pentobarbital-like discriminative stimulus effects of N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists.

Authors:  J Willetts; R L Balster
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.030

9.  Phencyclidine discrimination in the pigeon using color tracking under second-order schedule.

Authors:  D E McMillan; D A Cole-Fullenwider; W C Hardwick; G R Wenger
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Drug discrimination under a concurrent schedule.

Authors:  S H Snodgrass; D E McMillan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  4 in total

1.  Drug discrimination under a concurrent fixed-ratio fixed-ratio schedule.

Authors:  D E McMillan; M Li
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Drug discrimination under concurrent variable-ratio variable-ratio schedules.

Authors:  D E McMillan; W C Hardwick; Mi Li
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Drug discrimination in rats under concurrent variable-interval variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  D E McMillan; W C Hardwick
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Drug discrimination under two concurrent fixed-interval fixed-interval schedules.

Authors:  D E McMillan; M Li
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.468

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.