Literature DB >> 8308494

Kinetics of matching.

T A Mark1, C R Gallistel.   

Abstract

Rats responded on concurrent variable interval schedules of brain stimulation reward in 2-trial sessions. Between trials, there was a 16-fold reversal in the relative rate of reward. In successive, narrow time windows, the authors compared the ratio of the times spent on the 2 levers to the ratio of the rewards received. Time-allocation ratios tracked wide, random fluctuations in the reward ratio. The adjustment to the midsession reversal in relative rate of reward was largely completed within 1 interreward interval on the leaner schedule. Both results were unaffected by a 16-fold change in the combined rates of reward. The large, rapid, scale-invariant shifts in time-allocation ratios that underlie matching behavior imply that the subjective relative rate of reward can be determined by a very few of the most recent interreward intervals and that this estimate can directly determine the ratio of the expected stay durations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8308494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  17 in total

1.  Preference and resistance to change in concurrent variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  Matthew C Bell; Ben A Williams
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  2002-02

2.  Concurrent-chain performance in transition: effects of terminal-link duration and individual reinforcers.

Authors:  James E Mazur
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  2002-08

3.  Arousal, changeover responses, and preference in concurrent schedules.

Authors:  Margaret A McDevitt; Ben A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Linear-Nonlinear-Poisson models of primate choice dynamics.

Authors:  Greg S Corrado; Leo P Sugrue; H Sebastian Seung; William T Newsome
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Dynamic response-by-response models of matching behavior in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Brian Lau; Paul W Glimcher
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Decision makers calibrate behavioral persistence on the basis of time-interval experience.

Authors:  Joseph T McGuire; Joseph W Kable
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-04-23

7.  Dynamics of time matching: Arousal makes better seem worse.

Authors:  J Gibbon
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-06

8.  Serial discrimination reversal learning in pigeons as a function of intertrial interval and delay of reinforcement.

Authors:  Bertram O Ploog; Ben A Williams
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.986

9.  Long-term risk preference and suboptimal decision making following adolescent alcohol use.

Authors:  Nicholas A Nasrallah; Tom W H Yang; Ilene L Bernstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Dynamics of choice: a tutorial.

Authors:  William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.