Literature DB >> 8636660

Drug discrimination under a concurrent schedule.

S H Snodgrass1, D E McMillan.   

Abstract

Three pigeons were trained to discriminate a 5.0 mg/kg dose of pentobarbital from saline under a two-key concurrent schedule with responding on the key associated with the presession injection, under both stimulus conditions, producing four times as many reinforcers as responding on the other key. This concurrent schedule resulted in approximately 70% responding to the higher reinforcement key under the pentobarbital stimulus and approximately 30% responding to that key under the saline stimulus. During testing, then, the pigeons were able to dose-dependently emit higher (>70%) or lower (<30%) values than were established under the control conditions. Dose-response curves were determined for pentobarbital (twice), methamphetamine, phencyclidine, chlordiazepoxide, and the combination of pentobarbital and the barbiturate antagonist bemegride. The results obtained with pentobarbital and chlordiazepoxide showed that, as the dose increased, pentobarbital-appropriate responding also increased. Methamphetamine produced relatively flat dose--response curves, whereas phencyclidine administration produced inconsistent effects on responding. The combination of the training dose of pentobarbital with increasing doses of bemegride produced a decrease in pentobarbital-appropriate responding. The results also showed that the dose-response curves for pentobarbital and chlordiazepoxide, instead of being all or none, were graded functions of the drug dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8636660      PMCID: PMC1349948          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  20 in total

1.  Measures of stimulus generalization in drug discrimination experiments.

Authors:  I.P. Stoleman
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.293

2.  The time is ripe for an experimental analysis of measurement issues Commentary on Stolerman "Measurement issues in drug discrimination"

Authors:  A.M. Young
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.293

3.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Maximizing and matching on concurrent ratio schedules.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein; D H Loveland
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Reinforcement for errors in a signal-detection procedure.

Authors:  M Davison; D McCarthy
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Effects of varying stimulus disparity and the reinforcer ratio in concurrent-schedule and signal-detection procedures.

Authors:  B Alsop; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Reinforcement contingencies and signal detection.

Authors:  J A Nevin; P Jenkins; S Whittaker; P Yarensky
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Pentobarbital-like discriminative stimulus effects of N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists.

Authors:  J Willetts; R L Balster
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.030

10.  Discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine in rats trained under different schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  I P Stolerman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  6 in total

1.  Drug discrimination under a concurrent fixed-ratio fixed-ratio schedule.

Authors:  D E McMillan; M Li
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Drug discrimination under concurrent variable-ratio variable-ratio schedules.

Authors:  D E McMillan; W C Hardwick; Mi Li
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Drug discrimination under a concurrent fixed-interval fixed-interval schedule.

Authors:  D E McMillan; M Li; W C Hardwick
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Drug discrimination in rats under concurrent variable-interval variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  D E McMillan; W C Hardwick
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Drug discrimination under two concurrent fixed-interval fixed-interval schedules.

Authors:  D E McMillan; M Li
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Navigation in the Morris swim task as a baseline for drug discrimination: a demonstration with morphine.

Authors:  David Ziegler; Julian R Keith; Raymond C Pitts; Mark Galizio
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.468

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.