Literature DB >> 19780156

Independent slab-phase modulation combined with parallel imaging in bilateral breast MRI.

Misung Han1, Philip J Beatty, Bruce L Daniel, Brian A Hargreaves.   

Abstract

Independent slab-phase modulation allows three-dimensional imaging of multiple volumes without encoding the space between volumes, thus reducing scan time. Parallel imaging further accelerates data acquisition by exploiting coil sensitivity differences between volumes. This work compared bilateral breast image quality from self-calibrated parallel imaging reconstruction methods such as modified sensitivity encoding, generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions and autocalibrated reconstruction for Cartesian sampling (ARC) for data with and without slab-phase modulation. A study showed an improvement of image quality by incorporating slab-phase modulation. Geometry factors measured from phantom images were more homogenous and lower on average when slab-phase modulation was used for both mSENSE and GRAPPA reconstructions. The resulting improved signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was validated for in vivo images as well using ARC instead of GRAPPA, illustrating average SNR efficiency increases in mSENSE by 5% and ARC by 8% based on region of interest analysis. Furthermore, aliasing artifacts from mSENSE reconstruction were reduced when slab-phase modulation was used. Overall, slab-phase modulation with parallel imaging improved image quality and efficiency for 3D bilateral breast imaging. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19780156      PMCID: PMC4105446          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  24 in total

1.  Adaptive reconstruction of phased array MR imagery.

Authors:  D O Walsh; A F Gmitro; M W Marcellin
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI.

Authors:  K P Pruessmann; M Weiger; M B Scheidegger; P Boesiger
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  A comparison of two methods for measuring the signal to noise ratio on MR images.

Authors:  M J Firbank; A Coulthard; R M Harrison; E D Williams
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA).

Authors:  Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob; Robin M Heidemann; Mathias Nittka; Vladimir Jellus; Jianmin Wang; Berthold Kiefer; Axel Haase
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  The NMR phased array.

Authors:  P B Roemer; W A Edelstein; C E Hayes; S P Souza; O M Mueller
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Phase-offset multiplanar (POMP) volume imaging: a new technique.

Authors:  G H Glover
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Fat-suppressed three-dimensional MR imaging of the breast.

Authors:  S E Harms; D P Flamig; K L Hesley; W P Evans; J H Cheek; G N Peters; S M Knox; D A Savino; G J Netto; R B Wells
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 5.333

8.  Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition.

Authors:  Mieke Kriege; Cecile T M Brekelmans; Carla Boetes; Peter E Besnard; Harmine M Zonderland; Inge Marie Obdeijn; Radu A Manoliu; Theo Kok; Hans Peterse; Madeleine M A Tilanus-Linthorst; Sara H Muller; Sybren Meijer; Jan C Oosterwijk; Louk V A M Beex; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Harry J de Koning; Emiel J T Rutgers; Jan G M Klijn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations.

Authors:  Thomas M Kolb; Jacob Lichy; Jeffrey H Newhouse
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations.

Authors:  S H Heywang; A Wolf; E Pruss; T Hilbertz; W Eiermann; W Permanetter
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  4 in total

1.  Simultaneous bilateral-knee MR imaging.

Authors:  Feliks Kogan; Evan Levine; Akshay S Chaudhari; Uchechukwuka D Monu; Kevin Epperson; Edwin H G Oei; Garry E Gold; Brian A Hargreaves
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-12-17       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Homogenous fat suppression for bilateral breast imaging using independent shims.

Authors:  Misung Han; Charles H Cunningham; John M Pauly; Bruce L Daniel; Brian A Hargreaves
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 3.  Parallel MR imaging.

Authors:  Anagha Deshmane; Vikas Gulani; Mark A Griswold; Nicole Seiberlich
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Volumetric Arterial Spin-labeled Perfusion Imaging of the Kidneys with a Three-dimensional Fast Spin Echo Acquisition.

Authors:  Philip M Robson; Ananth J Madhuranthakam; Martin P Smith; Maryellen R M Sun; Weiying Dai; Neil M Rofsky; Ivan Pedrosa; David C Alsop
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 3.173

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.