Literature DB >> 8008780

Effects of irrelevant spatial S-R compatibility depend on stimulus complexity.

B Hommel1.   

Abstract

Choice-reaction time is known to depend on the spatial correspondence of stimulus and response, even if the stimulus location is irrelevant to the task (Simon effect). An experiment investigated whether this effect depends on stimulus complexity--i.e., on whether properties of the stimulus render stimulus discrimination easy or difficult. It was hypothesized that high demands on discrimination slow down the processing of stimulus identity in relation to location, so that the facilitating or conflicting location code has more time to decay, thus losing impact on response selection. In fact, the results revealed an effect or irrelevant spatial S-R correspondence with easy, but not with difficult, stimulus discrimination. This finding resolves an apparent contradiction between the results of several previous experiments on the Simon effect.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8008780     DOI: 10.1007/BF00419705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  11 in total

1.  S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes.

Authors:  P M FITTS; C M SEEGER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1953-09

2.  Splitting visual space with attention.

Authors:  R Nicoletti; C Umiltá
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Effects of multiple reference points in spatial stimulus-response compatibility.

Authors:  K Lamberts; G Tavernier; G d'Ydewalle
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1992-03

4.  Attentional focussing and spatial stimulus-response compatibility.

Authors:  T H Stoffer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1991

5.  Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing.

Authors:  J R Simon; A P Rudell
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1967-06

6.  S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code.

Authors:  R J Wallace
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-06

7.  Spatial relationships and S-R compatibility.

Authors:  J Brebner; M Shephard; P Cairney
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1972-02

8.  Detecting conjunctions of color and form: reassessing the serial search hypothesis.

Authors:  H Pashler
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-03

9.  The role of attention for the Simon effect.

Authors:  B Hommel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1993

10.  A feature-integration theory of attention.

Authors:  A M Treisman; G Gelade
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  18 in total

1.  Deconstructing Marilyn: robust effects of face contexts on stimulus-response compatibility.

Authors:  R W Proctor; D F Pick
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-11

Review 2.  Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects.

Authors:  Yang Seok Cho; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

3.  Searching for the functional locus of the SNARC effect: evidence for a response-related origin.

Authors:  Inge M Keus; Wolf Schwarz
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-06

4.  The timing of stimulus localisation and the Simon effect: an ERP study.

Authors:  Edmund Wascher
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-02-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Simon says: reliability and the role of working memory and attentional control in the simon task.

Authors:  Karl W U Borgmann; Evan E Risko; Jennifer A Stolz; Derek Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-04

6.  The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects.

Authors:  C H Lu; R W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-06

7.  Reaction time distribution analysis of spatial correspondence effects.

Authors:  Robert W Proctor; James D Miles; Giulia Baroni
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-04

8.  A computational model of the Simon effect.

Authors:  M Zorzi; C Umiltà
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1995

9.  Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years: evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task switching.

Authors:  Matthew C Davidson; Dima Amso; Loren Cruess Anderson; Adele Diamond
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Your conflict matters to me! Behavioral and neural manifestations of control adjustment after self-experienced and observed decision-conflict.

Authors:  Jasper Winkel; Jasper G Wijnen; K Richard Ridderinkhof; Iris I A Groen; Jan Derrfuss; Claudia Danielmeier; Birte U Forstmann
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.