Literature DB >> 10581298

Population models of genomic imprinting. I. Differential viability in the sexes and the analogy with genetic dominance.

R J Anderson1, H G Spencer.   

Abstract

Many single-locus, two-allele selection models of genomic imprinting have been shown to reduce formally to one-locus Mendelian models with a modified parameter for genetic dominance. One exception is the model where selection at the imprinted locus affects the sexes differently. We present two models of maternal inactivation with differential viability in the sexes, one with complete inactivation, and the other with a partial penetrance for inactivation. We show that, provided dominance relations at the imprintable locus are the same in both sexes, a globally stable polymorphism exists for a range of viabilities that is independent of the penetrance of imprinting. The conditions for a polymorphism are the same as in previous models with differential viability in the sexes but without imprinting and in a model of the paternal X-inactivation system in marsupials. The model with incomplete inactivation is used to illustrate the analogy between imprinting and dominance by comparing equilibrium bifurcation plots for fixed values of dominance and penetrance. We also derive a single expression for the dominance parameter that leaves the frequency and stability of equilibria unchanged for all levels of inactivation. Although an imprinting model with sex differences does not formally reduce to a nonimprinting scheme, close theoretical parallels clearly exist.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10581298      PMCID: PMC1460859     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  24 in total

1.  Data on the genetics of birth weight.

Authors:  L S PENROSE
Journal:  Ann Eugen       Date:  1952-05

Review 2.  The conflict theory of genomic imprinting: how much can be explained?

Authors:  Y Iwasa
Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Parental antagonism, relatedness asymmetries, and genomic imprinting.

Authors:  D Haig
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Genetic conflicts, multiple paternity and the evolution of genomic imprinting.

Authors:  H G Spencer; M W Feldman; A G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Growth effects of uniparental disomies and the conflict theory of genomic imprinting.

Authors:  L D Hurst; G T McVean
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 11.639

6.  Effects of differential selection in the sexes on cytonuclear polymorphism and disequilibria.

Authors:  C S Babcock; M A Asmussen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Owen's model of a genetical system with differential viability between sexes.

Authors:  S P Mandel
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  The molecular basis of dominance.

Authors:  H Kacser; J A Burns
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1981 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Parental genomic imprinting of the human IGF2 gene.

Authors:  N Giannoukakis; C Deal; J Paquette; C G Goodyer; C Polychronakos
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Parental imprinting of the mouse insulin-like growth factor II gene.

Authors:  T M DeChiara; E J Robertson; A Efstratiadis
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-02-22       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  8 in total

1.  The correlation between relatives on the supposition of genomic imprinting.

Authors:  Hamish G Spencer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Intralocus sexual conflict can drive the evolution of genomic imprinting.

Authors:  Troy Day; Russell Bonduriansky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Sex-specific viability, sex linkage and dominance in genomic imprinting.

Authors:  Jeremy Van Cleve; Marcus W Feldman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  One- and two-locus population models with differential viability between sexes: parallels between haploid parental selection and genomic imprinting.

Authors:  Alexey Yanchukov
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-05-17       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Effects of genomic imprinting on quantitative traits.

Authors:  Hamish G Spencer
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  Reciprocally imprinted genes and the response to selection on one sex.

Authors:  Manus M Patten; David Haig
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Genomic imprinting leads to less selectively maintained polymorphism on X chromosomes.

Authors:  Anna W Santure; Hamish G Spencer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Genetic and environmental contributions to body mass index: comparative analysis of monozygotic twins, dizygotic twins and same-age unrelated siblings.

Authors:  N L Segal; R Feng; S A McGuire; D B Allison; S Miller
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 5.095

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.