Literature DB >> 12019254

The correlation between relatives on the supposition of genomic imprinting.

Hamish G Spencer1.   

Abstract

Standard genetic analyses assume that reciprocal heterozygotes are, on average, phenotypically identical. If a locus is subject to genomic imprinting, however, this assumption does not hold. We incorporate imprinting into the standard quantitative-genetic model for two alleles at a single locus, deriving expressions for the additive and dominance components of genetic variance, as well as measures of resemblance among relatives. We show that, in contrast to the case with Mendelian expression, the additive and dominance deviations are correlated. In principle, this correlation allows imprinting to be detected solely on the basis of different measures of familial resemblances, but in practice, the standard error of the estimate is likely to be too large for a test to have much statistical power. The effects of genomic imprinting will need to be incorporated into quantitative-genetic models of many traits, for example, those concerned with mammalian birthweight.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12019254      PMCID: PMC1462108     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  16 in total

1.  Population models of genomic imprinting. I. Differential viability in the sexes and the analogy with genetic dominance.

Authors:  R J Anderson; H G Spencer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Estimating quantitative genetic parameters in haplodiploid organisms.

Authors:  F H Liu; S M Smith
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Allelic expression of IGF2 in marsupials and birds.

Authors:  M J O'Neill; R S Ingram; P B Vrana; S M Tilghman
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 0.900

Review 4.  Population genetics and evolution of genomic imprinting.

Authors:  H G Spencer
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 16.830

5.  An imprinted QTL with major effect on muscle mass and fat deposition maps to the IGF2 locus in pigs.

Authors:  C Nezer; L Moreau; B Brouwers; W Coppieters; J Detilleux; R Hanset; L Karim; A Kvasz; P Leroy; M Georges
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 6.  Genomic imprinting in mammals.

Authors:  M S Bartolomei; S M Tilghman
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 16.830

7.  Genomic imprinting of the insulin-like growth factor 2 gene in sheep.

Authors:  R J McLaren; G W Montgomery
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.957

8.  Genomic imprinting is disrupted in interspecific Peromyscus hybrids.

Authors:  P B Vrana; X J Guan; R S Ingram; S M Tilghman
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Parental genomic imprinting of the human IGF2 gene.

Authors:  N Giannoukakis; C Deal; J Paquette; C G Goodyer; C Polychronakos
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Parental imprinting of rat insulin-like growth factor II gene promoters is coordinately regulated.

Authors:  P V Pedone; M P Cosma; P Ungaro; V Colantuoni; C B Bruni; R Zarrilli; A Riccio
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1994-09-30       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  22 in total

1.  Rethinking inheritance, yet again: inheritomes, contextomes and dynamic phenotypes.

Authors:  N G Prasad; Sutirth Dey; Amitabh Joshi; T N C Vidya
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.166

2.  Population models of genomic imprinting. II. Maternal and fertility selection.

Authors:  Hamish G Spencer; Timothy Dorn; Thomas LoFaro
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-06-18       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Influence of mom and dad: quantitative genetic models for maternal effects and genomic imprinting.

Authors:  Anna W Santure; Hamish G Spencer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-06-04       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Ordered genotypes: an extended ITO method and a general formula for genetic covariance.

Authors:  Feng Dai; Daniel E Weeks
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  A chip off the old block: a model for the evolution of genomic imprinting via selection for parental similarity.

Authors:  Hamish G Spencer; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Relative contribution of additive, dominance, and imprinting effects to phenotypic variation in body size and growth between divergent selection lines of mice.

Authors:  Reinmar Hager; James M Cheverud; Jason B Wolf
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 7.  Effects of genomic imprinting on quantitative traits.

Authors:  Hamish G Spencer
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 8.  What are maternal effects (and what are they not)?

Authors:  Jason B Wolf; Michael J Wade
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 9.  Quantitative epigenetics and evolution.

Authors:  Joshua A Banta; Christina L Richards
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Genomic imprinting effects on adult body composition in mice.

Authors:  James M Cheverud; Reinmar Hager; Charles Roseman; Gloria Fawcett; Bing Wang; Jason B Wolf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.