Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Parental antagonism, relatedness asymmetries, and genomic imprinting.

Literature DB >> 9404029

Parental antagonism, relatedness asymmetries, and genomic imprinting.

Abstract

The theory of inclusive fitness can be modified to consider separate coefficients of relatedness for an individual's maternal and paternal alleles. A gene is said to have parentally antagonistic effects if it has an inclusive fitness benefit when maternally derived, but an inclusive fitness cost when paternally derived (or vice versa). Parental antagonism favours the evolution of alleles that are expressed only when maternally derived or only when paternally derived (genomic imprinting).

Entities: Disease

Mesh：

Substances：

Year: 1997 PMID： 9404029 PMCID： PMC1688715 DOI： 10.1098/rspb.1997.0230

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Biol Sci ISSN： 0962-8452 Impact factor: 5.349

16 in total

Review 1. Genomic imprinting in mammalian development: a parental tug-of-war.

Authors: T Moore; D Haig
Journal: Trends Genet Date: 1991-02 Impact factor: 11.639

Review 2. Genomic imprinting and the strange case of the insulin-like growth factor II receptor.

Authors: D Haig; C Graham
Journal: Cell Date: 1991-03-22 Impact factor: 41.582

3. Molecular evolution of imprinted genes: no evidence for antagonistic coevolution.

Authors: G T McVean; L D Hurst
Journal: Proc Biol Sci Date: 1997-05-22 Impact factor: 5.349

4. Genomic imprinting of Mash2, a mouse gene required for trophoblast development.

Authors: F Guillemot; T Caspary; S M Tilghman; N G Copeland; D J Gilbert; N A Jenkins; D J Anderson; A L Joyner; J Rossant; A Nagy
Journal: Nat Genet Date: 1995-03 Impact factor: 38.330

Review 5. Parental imprinting of autosomal mammalian genes.

Authors: A Efstratiadis
Journal: Curr Opin Genet Dev Date: 1994-04 Impact factor: 5.578

6. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II.

Authors: W D Hamilton
Journal: J Theor Biol Date: 1964-07 Impact factor: 2.691

7. Mice carrying null mutations of the genes encoding insulin-like growth factor I (Igf-1) and type 1 IGF receptor (Igf1r).

Authors: J P Liu; J Baker; A S Perkins; E J Robertson; A Efstratiadis
Journal: Cell Date: 1993-10-08 Impact factor: 41.582

8. A candidate mouse model for Prader-Willi syndrome which shows an absence of Snrpn expression.

Authors: B M Cattanach; J A Barr; E P Evans; M Burtenshaw; C V Beechey; S E Leff; C I Brannan; N G Copeland; N A Jenkins; J Jones
Journal: Nat Genet Date: 1992-12 Impact factor: 38.330

9. Parental imprinting of the mouse insulin-like growth factor II gene.

Authors: T M DeChiara; E J Robertson; A Efstratiadis
Journal: Cell Date: 1991-02-22 Impact factor: 41.582

10. Loss of the imprinted IGF2/cation-independent mannose 6-phosphate receptor results in fetal overgrowth and perinatal lethality.

Authors: M M Lau; C E Stewart; Z Liu; H Bhatt; P Rotwein; C L Stewart
Journal: Genes Dev Date: 1994-12-15 Impact factor: 11.361

73 in total

1. Population models of genomic imprinting. I. Differential viability in the sexes and the analogy with genetic dominance.

Authors: R J Anderson; H G Spencer
Journal: Genetics Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 4.562

Parental antagonism, relatedness asymmetries, and genomic imprinting.

Review 1. Genomic imprinting in mammalian development: a parental tug-of-war.

Review 2. Genomic imprinting and the strange case of the insulin-like growth factor II receptor.

3. Molecular evolution of imprinted genes: no evidence for antagonistic coevolution.

4. Genomic imprinting of Mash2, a mouse gene required for trophoblast development.

Review 5. Parental imprinting of autosomal mammalian genes.

6. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II.

7. Mice carrying null mutations of the genes encoding insulin-like growth factor I (Igf-1) and type 1 IGF receptor (Igf1r).

8. A candidate mouse model for Prader-Willi syndrome which shows an absence of Snrpn expression.

9. Parental imprinting of the mouse insulin-like growth factor II gene.

10. Loss of the imprinted IGF2/cation-independent mannose 6-phosphate receptor results in fetal overgrowth and perinatal lethality.

1. Population models of genomic imprinting. I. Differential viability in the sexes and the analogy with genetic dominance.

2. Genomic imprinting, sibling solidairity and the logic of collective action.

3. Genetic conflicts in genomic imprinting.

Review 4. The origin of alternation of generations in land plants: a focus on matrotrophy and hexose transport.

5. Uncoupling direct and indirect components of female choice in the wild.

6. Parental modifiers, antisense transcripts and loss of imprinting.

7. Coadaptation in mother and infant regulated by a paternally expressed imprinted gene.

Review 8. How life history and demography promote or inhibit the evolution of helping behaviours.

9. Speciation and reduced hybrid female fertility in house mice.

10. Evolutionary genetic models of the ovarian time bomb hypothesis for the evolution of genomic imprinting.