Literature DB >> 18562661

Reciprocally imprinted genes and the response to selection on one sex.

Manus M Patten1, David Haig.   

Abstract

We explore the theoretical consequences of limiting selection to males for the evolution of imprinted genes. We find that the efficiency of male-limited selection depends on the pattern of imprinting at an imprinted locus. When selection is strong, the maternally expressed pattern of imprinting allows faster genetic change than the reciprocal, paternally expressed pattern. When selection is relatively weak, the pattern of imprinting that permits a greater rate of genetic response to selection depends on the frequency of the favored allele: the paternally expressed pattern permits faster genetic change than does the maternally expressed pattern at low frequencies of a favored allele; at higher frequencies of a favored allele, however, the maternally expressed pattern is again more conducive to a genetic response. To our knowledge, this is the first theoretical description of a difference between the two reciprocal patterns of imprinting. The selective efficiency bias we identify between the two patterns of imprinting has implications for natural and livestock populations, which we discuss.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18562661      PMCID: PMC2475741          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.077651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  25 in total

Review 1.  Genomic imprinting: parental influence on the genome.

Authors:  W Reik; J Walter
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  On the detection of imprinted quantitative trait loci in experimental crosses of outbred species.

Authors:  Dirk-Jan de Koning; Henk Bovenhuis; Johan A M van Arendonk
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Estimation of variances for gametic effects on litter size in Yorkshire and Landrace swine.

Authors:  A Stella; K J Stalder; A M Saxton; P J Boettcher
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Intralocus sexual conflict can drive the evolution of genomic imprinting.

Authors:  Troy Day; Russell Bonduriansky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Basics of gametic imprinting.

Authors:  A Ruvinsky
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  A statistical framework for genome-wide scanning and testing of imprinted quantitative trait loci.

Authors:  Yuehua Cui
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  Sex-specific viability, sex linkage and dominance in genomic imprinting.

Authors:  Jeremy Van Cleve; Marcus W Feldman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 8.  A census of mammalian imprinting.

Authors:  Ian M Morison; Joshua P Ramsay; Hamish G Spencer
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 11.639

9.  Completion of mouse embryogenesis requires both the maternal and paternal genomes.

Authors:  J McGrath; D Solter
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Multiple marker mapping of quantitative trait loci in a cross between outbred wild boar and large white pigs.

Authors:  S A Knott; L Marklund; C S Haley; K Andersson; W Davies; H Ellegren; M Fredholm; I Hansson; B Hoyheim; K Lundström; M Moller; L Andersson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  5 in total

1.  Sexually antagonistic selection promotes genetic divergence between males and females in an ant.

Authors:  Pierre-André Eyer; Alexander J Blumenfeld; Edward L Vargo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  DNA sequence polymorphisms in a panel of eight candidate bovine imprinted genes and their association with performance traits in Irish Holstein-Friesian cattle.

Authors:  David A Magee; Klaudia M Sikora; Erik W Berkowicz; Donagh P Berry; Dawn J Howard; Michael P Mullen; Ross D Evans; Charles Spillane; David E MacHugh
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 2.797

Review 3.  Sex Differences in Neurotoxicogenetics.

Authors:  Carolina Torres-Rojas; Byron C Jones
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  Two sexes, one genome: the evolutionary dynamics of intralocus sexual conflict.

Authors:  Tanya M Pennell; Edward H Morrow
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  The scope and strength of sex-specific selection in genome evolution.

Authors:  A E Wright; J E Mank
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 2.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.