Literature DB >> 10545467

The effect of tandem substitutions on the correlation between synonymous and nonsynonymous rates in rodents.

N G Smith1, L D Hurst.   

Abstract

Nonsynonymous substitutions in DNA cause amino acid substitutions while synonymous substitutions in DNA leave amino acids unchanged. The cause of the correlation between the substitution rates at nonsynonymous (K(A)) and synonymous (K(S)) sites in mammals is a contentious issue, and one that impacts on many aspects of molecular evolution. Here we use a large set of orthologous mammalian genes to investigate the causes of the K(A)-K(S) correlation in rodents. The strength of the K(A)-K(S) correlation exceeds the neutral theory expectation when substitution rates are estimated using algorithmic methods, but not when substitution rates are estimated by maximum likelihood. Irrespective of this methodological uncertainty the strength of the K(A)-K(S) correlation appears mostly due to tandem substitutions, an excess of which is generated by substitutional nonindependence. Doublet mutations cannot explain the excess of tandem synonymous-nonsynonymous substitutions, and substitution patterns indicate that selection on silent sites is the likely cause. We find no evidence for selection on codon usage. The nature of the relationship between synonymous divergence and base composition is unclear because we find a significant correlation if we use maximum-likelihood methods but not if we use algorithmic methods. Finally, we find that K(S) is reduced at the start of genes, which suggests that selection for RNA structure may affect silent sites in mammalian protein-coding genes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10545467      PMCID: PMC1460828     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  24 in total

1.  Evidence of selection on silent site base composition in mammals: potential implications for the evolution of isochores and junk DNA.

Authors:  A Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Sensitivity of patterns of molecular evolution to alterations in methodology: a critique of Hughes and Yeager.

Authors:  N G Smith; L D Hurst
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Problems with parsimony in sequences of biased base composition.

Authors:  A Eyre-Walker
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution distances are correlated in mouse and rat genes.

Authors:  W Makalowski; M S Boguski
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 5.  Translational selection and molecular evolution.

Authors:  H Akashi; A Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.578

6.  Synonymous substitution rates in Drosophila: mitochondrial versus nuclear genes.

Authors:  E N Moriyama; J R Powell
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Molecular evolution of imprinted genes: no evidence for antagonistic coevolution.

Authors:  G T McVean; L D Hurst
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  A codon-based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences.

Authors:  N Goldman; Z Yang
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood.

Authors:  Z Yang
Journal:  Comput Appl Biosci       Date:  1997-10

10.  Evolutionary parameters of the transcribed mammalian genome: an analysis of 2,820 orthologous rodent and human sequences.

Authors:  W Makalowski; M S Boguski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-08-04       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  17 in total

1.  Rates of nucleotide substitution and mammalian nuclear gene evolution. Approximate and maximum-likelihood methods lead to different conclusions.

Authors:  J P Bielawski; K A Dunn; Z Yang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Enhanced synonymous site divergence in positively selected vertebrate antimicrobial peptide genes.

Authors:  Jacob A Tennessen
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Widespread positive selection in synonymous sites of mammalian genes.

Authors:  Alissa M Resch; Liran Carmel; Leonardo Mariño-Ramírez; Aleksey Y Ogurtsov; Svetlana A Shabalina; Igor B Rogozin; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Recently duplicated maize R2R3 Myb genes provide evidence for distinct mechanisms of evolutionary divergence after duplication.

Authors:  Anusha P Dias; Edward L Braun; Michael D McMullen; Erich Grotewold
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Genes on human chromosome 19 show extreme divergence from the mouse orthologs and a high GC content.

Authors:  Jose Castresana
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Selection on codon usage for error minimization at the protein level.

Authors:  Marco Archetti
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Locating protein-coding sequences under selection for additional, overlapping functions in 29 mammalian genomes.

Authors:  Michael F Lin; Pouya Kheradpour; Stefan Washietl; Brian J Parker; Jakob S Pedersen; Manolis Kellis
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  The signature of selection mediated by expression on human genes.

Authors:  Araxi O Urrutia; Laurence D Hurst
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Evidence that replication-associated mutation alone does not explain between-chromosome differences in substitution rates.

Authors:  Catherine J Pink; Siva K Swaminathan; Ian Dunham; Jane Rogers; Andrew Ward; Laurence D Hurst
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  Genomic regionality in rates of evolution is not explained by clustering of genes of comparable expression profile.

Authors:  Martin J Lercher; Jean-Vincent Chamary; Laurence D Hurst
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 9.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.