Literature DB >> 10353909

Evidence of selection on silent site base composition in mammals: potential implications for the evolution of isochores and junk DNA.

A Eyre-Walker1.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that mutation bias is the major determinant of base composition bias at synonymous, intron, and flanking DNA sites in mammals. Here I test this hypothesis using population genetic data from the major histocompatibility genes of several mammalian species. The results of two tests are inconsistent with the mutation hypothesis in coding, noncoding, CpG-island, and non-CpG-island DNA, but are consistent with selection or biased gene conversion. It is argued that biased gene conversion is unlikely to affect silent site base composition in mammals. The results therefore suggest that selection is acting upon silent site G + C content. This may have broad implications, since silent site base composition reflects large-scale variation in G + C content along mammalian chromosomes. The results therefore suggest that selection may be acting upon the base composition of isochores and large sections of junk DNA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10353909      PMCID: PMC1460637     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  30 in total

1.  Problems with parsimony in sequences of biased base composition.

Authors:  A Eyre-Walker
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Compositional constraints and genome evolution.

Authors:  G Bernardi; G Bernardi
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  CpG islands in vertebrate genomes.

Authors:  M Gardiner-Garden; M Frommer
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1987-07-20       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Correlation between molecular clock ticking, codon usage fidelity of DNA repair, chromosome banding and chromatin compactness in germline cells.

Authors:  J Filipski
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1987-06-15       Impact factor: 4.124

5.  Confidence interval for the number of selectively neutral amino acid polymorphisms.

Authors:  S A Sawyer; D E Dykhuizen; D L Hartl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Mutation rates differ among regions of the mammalian genome.

Authors:  K H Wolfe; P M Sharp; W H Li
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-01-19       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  The double-strand-break repair model for recombination.

Authors:  J W Szostak; T L Orr-Weaver; R J Rothstein; F W Stahl
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Molecular analysis of the hotspot of recombination in the murine major histocompatibility complex.

Authors:  J A Kobori; E Strauss; K Minard; L Hood
Journal:  Science       Date:  1986-10-10       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila.

Authors:  J H McDonald; M Kreitman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-06-20       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Molecular characterization of a meiotic recombinational hotspot enhancing homologous equal crossing-over.

Authors:  Y Uematsu; H Kiefer; R Schulze; K Fischer-Lindahl; M Steinmetz
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  65 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of molecular evolution.

Authors:  T Ohta
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2000-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  The effect of tandem substitutions on the correlation between synonymous and nonsynonymous rates in rodents.

Authors:  N G Smith; L D Hurst
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Rates of nucleotide substitution and mammalian nuclear gene evolution. Approximate and maximum-likelihood methods lead to different conclusions.

Authors:  J P Bielawski; K A Dunn; Z Yang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Nucleotide polymorphism at the RpII215 gene in Drosophila subobscura. Weak selection on synonymous mutations.

Authors:  A Llopart; M Aguadé
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Positive and negative selection on the human genome.

Authors:  J C Fay; G J Wyckoff; C I Wu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Genetic screens for factors involved in the notum bristle loss of interspecific hybrids between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

Authors:  T Takano-Shimizu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Weak selection and recent mutational changes influence polymorphic synonymous mutations in humans.

Authors:  Josep M Comeron
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Patterns of intra- and interhost nonsynonymous variation reveal strong purifying selection in dengue virus.

Authors:  Edward C Holmes
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  Molecular basis of adaptive convergence in experimental populations of RNA viruses.

Authors:  José M Cuevas; Santiago F Elena; Andrés Moya
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Isochore structures in the genome of the plant Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Ren Zhang; Chun-Ting Zhang
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.395

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.