Literature DB >> 9321417

Synonymous substitution rates in Drosophila: mitochondrial versus nuclear genes.

E N Moriyama1, J R Powell.   

Abstract

Synonymous substitution rates in mitochondrial and nuclear genes of Drosophila were compared. To make accurate comparisons, we considered the following: (1) relative synonymous rates, which do not require divergence time estimates, should be used; (2) methods estimating divergence should take into account base composition; (3) only very closely related species should be used to avoid effects of saturation; (4) the heterogeneity of rates should be examined. We modified the methods estimating synonymous substitution numbers to account for base composition bias. By using these methods, we found that mitochondrial genes have 1.7-3.4 times higher synonymous substitution rates than the fastest nuclear genes or 4.5-9.0 times higher rates than the average nuclear genes. The average rate of synonymous transversions was 2.7 (estimated from the melanogaster species subgroup) or 2.9 (estimated from the obscura group) times higher in mitochondrial genes than in nuclear genes. Synonymous transversions in mitochondrial genes occurred at an approximately equivalent rate to those in the fastest nuclear genes. This last result is not consistent with the hypothesis that the difference in turnover rates between mitochondrial and nuclear genomes is the major factor determining higher synonymous substitution rates in mtDNA. We conclude that the difference in synonymous substitution rates is due to a combination of two factors: a higher transitional mutation rate in mtDNA and constraints on nuclear genes due to selection for codon usage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9321417     DOI: 10.1007/pl00006243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  41 in total

1.  Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions when there are strong transition-transversion and G+C-content biases.

Authors:  K Tamura
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Rates of nucleotide substitution in Drosophila mitochondrial DNA and nuclear DNA are similar.

Authors:  J R Powell; A Caccone; G D Amato; C Yoon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Lack of polymorphism on the Drosophila fourth chromosome resulting from selection.

Authors:  A J Berry; J W Ajioka; M Kreitman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Unbiased estimation of the rates of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution.

Authors:  W H Li
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  A method for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions per site.

Authors:  J M Comeron
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 6.  A new method for estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous rates of nucleotide substitution considering the relative likelihood of nucleotide and codon changes.

Authors:  W H Li; C I Wu; C C Luo
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Mitochondrial DNA evolution in the melanogaster species subgroup of Drosophila.

Authors:  M Solignac; M Monnerot; J C Mounolou
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Mitochondrial DNA sequences of primates: tempo and mode of evolution.

Authors:  W M Brown; E M Prager; A Wang; A C Wilson
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  Molecular drift of the bride of sevenless (boss) gene in Drosophila.

Authors:  F J Ayala; D L Hartl
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Rates and patterns of scnDNA and mtDNA divergence within the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup.

Authors:  A Caccone; G D Amato; J R Powell
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  37 in total

1.  The effect of tandem substitutions on the correlation between synonymous and nonsynonymous rates in rodents.

Authors:  N G Smith; L D Hurst
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The causes of synonymous rate variation in the rodent genome. Can substitution rates be used to estimate the sex bias in mutation rate?

Authors:  N G Smith; L D Hurst
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Relative rates of nucleotide substitution in frogs.

Authors:  Andrew J Crawford
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 4.  The evolutionary processes of mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes differ from those of nuclear genomes.

Authors:  Helena Korpelainen
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2004-09-28

5.  Multilocus analysis of introgression between two sympatric sister species of Drosophila: Drosophila yakuba and D. santomea.

Authors:  Ana Llopart; Daniel Lachaise; Jerry A Coyne
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-06-18       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  RCPdb: An evolutionary classification and codon usage database for repeat-containing proteins.

Authors:  Noel G Faux; Gavin A Huttley; Khalid Mahmood; Geoffrey I Webb; Maria Garcia de la Banda; James C Whisstock
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Evolutionary rates and expression level in Chlamydomonas.

Authors:  Cristina E Popescu; Tudor Borza; Joseph P Bielawski; Robert W Lee
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Evolution of dopamine-related systems: biosynthesis, degradation and receptors.

Authors:  Xianghui Ma; Zhiwen Wang; Xinbo Zhang
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2010-10-02       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  Evolutionary EST analysis identifies rapidly evolving male reproductive proteins in Drosophila.

Authors:  W J Swanson; A G Clark; H M Waldrip-Dail; M F Wolfner; C F Aquadro
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-06-12       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Analysis of a shift in codon usage in Drosophila.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Powell; Erminia Sezzi; Etsuko N Moriyama; Jennifer M Gleason; Adalgisa Caccone
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.395

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.