Literature DB >> 12975314

The signature of selection mediated by expression on human genes.

Araxi O Urrutia1, Laurence D Hurst.   

Abstract

As the efficacy of natural selection is expected to be a function of population size, in humans it is usually presumed that selection is a weak force and hence that gene characteristics are mostly determined by stochastic forces. In contrast, in species with large population sizes, selection is expected to be a much more effective force. Evidence for this has come from examining how genic parameters vary with expression level, which appears to determine many of a gene's features, such as codon bias, amino acid composition, and size. However, not until now has it been possible to examine whether human genes show the signature of selection mediated by expression level. Here, then, to investigate this issue, we gathered expression data for >10,000 human genes from public data sets obtained by different technologies (SAGE and high-density oligonucleotide chip arrays) and compared them with gene parameters. We find that, even after controlling for regional effects, highly expressed genes code for smaller proteins, have less intronic DNA, and higher codon and amino acid biases. We conclude that, contrary to the usual supposition, human genes show signatures consistent with selection mediated by expression level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12975314      PMCID: PMC403694          DOI: 10.1101/gr.641103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  35 in total

Review 1.  Gene expression and molecular evolution.

Authors:  H Akashi
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.578

2.  Clustering of housekeeping genes provides a unified model of gene order in the human genome.

Authors:  Martin J Lercher; Araxi O Urrutia; Laurence D Hurst
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-05-06       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  A high-resolution recombination map of the human genome.

Authors:  Augustine Kong; Daniel F Gudbjartsson; Jesus Sainz; Gudrun M Jonsdottir; Sigurjon A Gudjonsson; Bjorgvin Richardsson; Sigrun Sigurdardottir; John Barnard; Bjorn Hallbeck; Gisli Masson; Adam Shlien; Stefan T Palsson; Michael L Frigge; Thorgeir E Thorgeirsson; Jeffrey R Gulcher; Kari Stefansson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-06-10       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 4.  Biased gene conversion: implications for genome and sex evolution.

Authors:  Gabriel Marais
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 11.639

5.  Genetic code synonym quotas and amino acid complexity: cutting the cost of proteins?

Authors:  M J Dufton
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1997-07-21       Impact factor: 2.691

6.  Large-scale analysis of the human and mouse transcriptomes.

Authors:  Andrew I Su; Michael P Cooke; Keith A Ching; Yaron Hakak; John R Walker; Tim Wiltshire; Anthony P Orth; Raquel G Vega; Lisa M Sapinoso; Aziz Moqrich; Ardem Patapoutian; Garret M Hampton; Peter G Schultz; John B Hogenesch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Codon usage bias covaries with expression breadth and the rate of synonymous evolution in humans, but this is not evidence for selection.

Authors:  A O Urrutia; L D Hurst
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Codon usage in bacteria: correlation with gene expressivity.

Authors:  M Gouy; C Gautier
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1982-11-25       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Metabolic efficiency and amino acid composition in the proteomes of Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Hiroshi Akashi; Takashi Gojobori
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Selection for short introns in highly expressed genes.

Authors:  Cristian I Castillo-Davis; Sergei L Mekhedov; Daniel L Hartl; Eugene V Koonin; Fyodor A Kondrashov
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-07-22       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  125 in total

1.  Gene expression intensity shapes evolutionary rates of the proteins encoded by the vertebrate genome.

Authors:  Sankar Subramanian; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Metabolic and translational efficiency in microbial organisms.

Authors:  Douglas W Raiford; Esley M Heizer; Robert V Miller; Travis E Doom; Michael L Raymer; Dan E Krane
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 3.  The Code of Silence: Widespread Associations Between Synonymous Codon Biases and Gene Function.

Authors:  Fran Supek
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Rapid Evolution of Ovarian-Biased Genes in the Yellow Fever Mosquito (Aedes aegypti).

Authors:  Carrie A Whittle; Cassandra G Extavour
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The small introns of antisense genes are better explained by selection for rapid transcription than by "genomic design".

Authors:  Jianjun Chen; Miao Sun; Janet D Rowley; Laurence D Hurst
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-09-02       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Genome size and chromatin condensation in vertebrates.

Authors:  Alexander E Vinogradov
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2005-01-13       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Analysis of expressed sequence tags from the harmful alga, Prymnesium parvum (Prymnesiophyceae, Haptophyta).

Authors:  John W La Claire
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2006-07-28       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 8.  Characteristics, causes and evolutionary consequences of male-biased mutation.

Authors:  Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Gene expression, intron density, and splice site strength in Drosophila and Caenorhabditis.

Authors:  Marie E Fahey; Desmond G Higgins
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 2.395

10.  Expression quantitative trait locus mapping across water availability environments reveals contrasting associations with genomic features in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  David B Lowry; Tierney L Logan; Luca Santuari; Christian S Hardtke; James H Richards; Leah J DeRose-Wilson; John K McKay; Saunak Sen; Thomas E Juenger
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 11.277

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.