Literature DB >> 15173108

Genomic regionality in rates of evolution is not explained by clustering of genes of comparable expression profile.

Martin J Lercher1, Jean-Vincent Chamary, Laurence D Hurst.   

Abstract

In mammalian genomes, linked genes show similar rates of evolution, both at fourfold degenerate synonymous sites (K4) and at nonsynonymous sites (KA). Although it has been suggested that the local similarity in the synonymous substitution rate is an artifact caused by the inclusion of disparately evolving gene pairs, we demonstrate here that this is not the case: after removal of disparately evolving genes, both (1) linked genes and (2) introns from the same gene have more similar silent substitution rates than expected by chance. What causes the local similarity in both synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates? One class of hypotheses argues that both may be related to the observed clustering of genes of comparable expression profile. We investigate these hypotheses using substitution rates from both human-mouse and mouse-rat comparisons, and employing three different methods to assay expression parameters. Although we confirm a negative correlation of expression breadth with both K4 and KA, we find no evidence that clustering of similarly expressed genes explains the clustering of genes of comparable substitution rates. If gene expression is not responsible, what about other causes? At least in the human-mouse comparison, the local similarity in KA can be explained by the covariation of KA and K4. As regards K4, our results appear consistent with the notion that local similarity is due to processes associated with meiotic recombination. Copyright 2004 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15173108      PMCID: PMC419778          DOI: 10.1101/gr.1597404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  72 in total

Review 1.  Evolutionary genomics: reading the bands.

Authors:  L D Hurst; A Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.345

2.  Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  J Castresana
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Evidence for a high frequency of simultaneous double-nucleotide substitutions.

Authors:  M Averof; A Rokas; K H Wolfe; P M Sharp
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-02-18       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The effect of tandem substitutions on the correlation between synonymous and nonsynonymous rates in rodents.

Authors:  N G Smith; L D Hurst
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  SAGEmap: a public gene expression resource.

Authors:  A E Lash; C M Tolstoshev; L Wagner; G D Schuler; R L Strausberg; G J Riggins; S F Altschul
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Regional similarities in polymorphism in the human genome extend over many megabases.

Authors:  Nick G C Smith; Martin J Lercher
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 11.639

7.  Estimate of the mutation rate per nucleotide in humans.

Authors:  M W Nachman; S L Crowell
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice.

Authors:  J D Thompson; D G Higgins; T J Gibson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1994-11-11       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Determinants of substitution rates in mammalian genes: expression pattern affects selection intensity but not mutation rate.

Authors:  L Duret; D Mouchiroud
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Association of increased spontaneous mutation rates with high levels of transcription in yeast.

Authors:  A Datta; S Jinks-Robertson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-06-16       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  Variation in the mutation rate across mammalian genomes.

Authors:  Alan Hodgkinson; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Similarity of synonymous substitution rates across mammalian genomes.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Chuang; Hao Li
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Comparison of the chicken and turkey genomes reveals a higher rate of nucleotide divergence on microchromosomes than macrochromosomes.

Authors:  Erik Axelsson; Matthew T Webster; Nick G C Smith; David W Burt; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-12-08       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Enhanced synonymous site divergence in positively selected vertebrate antimicrobial peptide genes.

Authors:  Jacob A Tennessen
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Evolutionary constraints in conserved nongenic sequences of mammals.

Authors:  Peter D Keightley; Gregory V Kryukov; Shamil Sunyaev; Daniel L Halligan; Daniel J Gaffney
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Widespread positive selection in synonymous sites of mammalian genes.

Authors:  Alissa M Resch; Liran Carmel; Leonardo Mariño-Ramírez; Aleksey Y Ogurtsov; Svetlana A Shabalina; Igor B Rogozin; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  A gradient in the distribution of introns in eukaryotic genes.

Authors:  A Ruvinsky; W Ward
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Substantial regional variation in substitution rates in the human genome: importance of GC content, gene density, and telomere-specific effects.

Authors:  Peter F Arndt; Terence Hwa; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  Evidence that replication-associated mutation alone does not explain between-chromosome differences in substitution rates.

Authors:  Catherine J Pink; Siva K Swaminathan; Ian Dunham; Jane Rogers; Andrew Ward; Laurence D Hurst
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  Spontaneous mutational and standing genetic (co)variation at dinucleotide microsatellites in Caenorhabditis briggsae and Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Naomi Phillips; Matthew Salomon; Andrew Custer; Dejerianne Ostrow; Charles F Baer
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 16.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.