Literature DB >> 26843641

Left Superior Temporal Gyrus Is Coupled to Attended Speech in a Cocktail-Party Auditory Scene.

Marc Vander Ghinst1, Mathieu Bourguignon2, Marc Op de Beeck3, Vincent Wens3, Brice Marty3, Sergio Hassid4, Georges Choufani4, Veikko Jousmäki5, Riitta Hari5, Patrick Van Bogaert3, Serge Goldman3, Xavier De Tiège3.   

Abstract

Using a continuous listening task, we evaluated the coupling between the listener's cortical activity and the temporal envelopes of different sounds in a multitalker auditory scene using magnetoencephalography and corticovocal coherence analysis. Neuromagnetic signals were recorded from 20 right-handed healthy adult humans who listened to five different recorded stories (attended speech streams), one without any multitalker background (No noise) and four mixed with a "cocktail party" multitalker background noise at four signal-to-noise ratios (5, 0, -5, and -10 dB) to produce speech-in-noise mixtures, here referred to as Global scene. Coherence analysis revealed that the modulations of the attended speech stream, presented without multitalker background, were coupled at ∼0.5 Hz to the activity of both superior temporal gyri, whereas the modulations at 4-8 Hz were coupled to the activity of the right supratemporal auditory cortex. In cocktail party conditions, with the multitalker background noise, the coupling was at both frequencies stronger for the attended speech stream than for the unattended Multitalker background. The coupling strengths decreased as the Multitalker background increased. During the cocktail party conditions, the ∼0.5 Hz coupling became left-hemisphere dominant, compared with bilateral coupling without the multitalker background, whereas the 4-8 Hz coupling remained right-hemisphere lateralized in both conditions. The brain activity was not coupled to the multitalker background or to its individual talkers. The results highlight the key role of listener's left superior temporal gyri in extracting the slow ∼0.5 Hz modulations, likely reflecting the attended speech stream within a multitalker auditory scene. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: When people listen to one person in a "cocktail party," their auditory cortex mainly follows the attended speech stream rather than the entire auditory scene. However, how the brain extracts the attended speech stream from the whole auditory scene and how increasing background noise corrupts this process is still debated. In this magnetoencephalography study, subjects had to attend a speech stream with or without multitalker background noise. Results argue for frequency-dependent cortical tracking mechanisms for the attended speech stream. The left superior temporal gyrus tracked the ∼0.5 Hz modulations of the attended speech stream only when the speech was embedded in multitalker background, whereas the right supratemporal auditory cortex tracked 4-8 Hz modulations during both noiseless and cocktail-party conditions.
Copyright © 2016 the authors 0270-6474/16/361597-11$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coherence analysis; magnetoencephalography; speech in noise

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26843641      PMCID: PMC6601992          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1730-15.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  48 in total

1.  Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions.

Authors:  J Ashburner; K J Friston
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Invariance between subjects of brain wave representations of language.

Authors:  P Suppes; B Han; J Epelboim; Z L Lu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples.

Authors:  Thomas E Nichols; Andrew P Holmes
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Speech comprehension is correlated with temporal response patterns recorded from auditory cortex.

Authors:  E Ahissar; S Nagarajan; M Ahissar; A Protopapas; H Mahncke; M M Merzenich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Temporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects.

Authors:  S Rosen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1992-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Surrogate data analysis for assessing the significance of the coherence function.

Authors:  Luca Faes; Gian Domenico Pinna; Alberto Porta; Roberto Maestri; Giandomenico Nollo
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Consonant identification in N-talker babble is a nonmonotonic function of N.

Authors:  Sarah A Simpson; Martin Cooke
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  The cortical organization of speech processing.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok; David Poeppel
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  Dynamic imaging of coherent sources: Studying neural interactions in the human brain.

Authors:  J Gross; J Kujala; M Hamalainen; L Timmermann; A Schnitzler; R Salmelin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-16       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Left thalamo-cortical network implicated in successful speech separation and identification.

Authors:  Claude Alain; Karen Reinke; Kelly L McDonald; Wilkin Chau; Fred Tam; Anda Pacurar; Simon Graham
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  23 in total

1.  Cortical Tracking of Speech-in-Noise Develops from Childhood to Adulthood.

Authors:  Marc Vander Ghinst; Mathieu Bourguignon; Maxime Niesen; Vincent Wens; Sergio Hassid; Georges Choufani; Veikko Jousmäki; Riitta Hari; Serge Goldman; Xavier De Tiège
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Neural entrainment to music is sensitive to melodic spectral complexity.

Authors:  Indiana Wollman; Pablo Arias; Jean-Julien Aucouturier; Benjamin Morillon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  The Common Rhythm of Action and Perception.

Authors:  Alessandro Benedetto; Maria Concetta Morrone; Alice Tomassini
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 4.  IFCN-endorsed practical guidelines for clinical magnetoencephalography (MEG).

Authors:  Riitta Hari; Sylvain Baillet; Gareth Barnes; Richard Burgess; Nina Forss; Joachim Gross; Matti Hämäläinen; Ole Jensen; Ryusuke Kakigi; François Mauguière; Nobukatzu Nakasato; Aina Puce; Gian-Luca Romani; Alfons Schnitzler; Samu Taulu
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Crossmodal Phase Reset and Evoked Responses Provide Complementary Mechanisms for the Influence of Visual Speech in Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Pierre Mégevand; Manuel R Mercier; David M Groppe; Elana Zion Golumbic; Nima Mesgarani; Michael S Beauchamp; Charles E Schroeder; Ashesh D Mehta
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Lip-Reading Enables the Brain to Synthesize Auditory Features of Unknown Silent Speech.

Authors:  Mathieu Bourguignon; Martijn Baart; Efthymia C Kapnoula; Nicola Molinaro
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Selective attention modulates neural envelope tracking of informationally masked speech in healthy older adults.

Authors:  Ira Kurthen; Jolanda Galbier; Laura Jagoda; Pia Neuschwander; Nathalie Giroud; Martin Meyer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Selective auditory attention within naturalistic scenes modulates reactivity to speech sounds.

Authors:  Hanna Renvall; Jaeho Seol; Riku Tuominen; Bettina Sorger; Lars Riecke; Riitta Salmelin
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 3.698

9.  Target Speaker Detection with Concealed EEG Around the Ear.

Authors:  Bojana Mirkovic; Martin G Bleichner; Maarten De Vos; Stefan Debener
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  The functional and structural characteristics of the emotion network in alexithymia.

Authors:  Dai Han; Mei Li; Minjun Mei; Xiaofei Sun
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 2.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.