Literature DB >> 9861061

Brain-wave recognition of sentences.

P Suppes1, B Han, Z L Lu.   

Abstract

Electrical and magnetic brain waves of two subjects were recorded for the purpose of recognizing which one of 12 sentences or seven words auditorily presented was processed. The analysis consisted of averaging over trials to create prototypes and test samples, to each of which a Fourier transform was applied, followed by filtering and an inverse transformation to the time domain. The filters used were optimal predictive filters, selected for each subject. A still further improvement was obtained by taking differences between recordings of two electrodes to obtain bipolar pairs that then were used for the same analysis. Recognition rates, based on a least-squares criterion, varied, but the best were above 90%. The first words of prototypes of sentences also were cut and pasted to test, at least partially, the invariance of a word's brain wave in different sentence contexts. The best result was above 80% correct recognition. Test samples made up only of individual trials also were analyzed. The best result was 134 correct of 288 (47%), which is promising, given that the expected recognition number by chance is just 24 (or 8.3%). The work reported in this paper extends our earlier work on brain-wave recognition of words only. The recognition rates reported here further strengthen the case that recordings of electric brain waves of words or sentences, together with extensive mathematical and statistical analysis, can be the basis of new developments in our understanding of brain processing of language.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9861061      PMCID: PMC28135          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.26.15861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  3 in total

1.  Brain wave recognition of words.

Authors:  P Suppes; Z L Lu; B Han
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Reading between the lines: event-related brain potentials during natural sentence processing.

Authors:  M Kutas; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Event-related brain potentials to semantically inappropriate and surprisingly large words.

Authors:  M Kutas; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 3.251

  3 in total
  16 in total

1.  Invariance of brain-wave representations of simple visual images and their names.

Authors:  P Suppes; B Han; J Epelboim; Z L Lu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-12-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Invariance between subjects of brain wave representations of language.

Authors:  P Suppes; B Han; J Epelboim; Z L Lu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Brain-wave representation of words by superposition of a few sine waves.

Authors:  P Suppes; B Han
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-07-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Identifying fragments of natural speech from the listener's MEG signals.

Authors:  Miika Koskinen; Jaakko Viinikanoja; Mikko Kurimo; Arto Klami; Samuel Kaski; Riitta Hari
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  The pace of prosodic phrasing couples the listener's cortex to the reader's voice.

Authors:  Mathieu Bourguignon; Xavier De Tiège; Marc Op de Beeck; Noémie Ligot; Philippe Paquier; Patrick Van Bogaert; Serge Goldman; Riitta Hari; Veikko Jousmäki
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Discrimination of speech stimuli based on neuronal response phase patterns depends on acoustics but not comprehension.

Authors:  Mary F Howard; David Poeppel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Phase patterns of neuronal responses reliably discriminate speech in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Huan Luo; David Poeppel
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-06-21       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Action planning and predictive coding when speaking.

Authors:  Jun Wang; Daniel H Mathalon; Brian J Roach; James Reilly; Sarah K Keedy; John A Sweeney; Judith M Ford
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Attentional gain control of ongoing cortical speech representations in a "cocktail party".

Authors:  Jess R Kerlin; Antoine J Shahin; Lee M Miller
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Left Superior Temporal Gyrus Is Coupled to Attended Speech in a Cocktail-Party Auditory Scene.

Authors:  Marc Vander Ghinst; Mathieu Bourguignon; Marc Op de Beeck; Vincent Wens; Brice Marty; Sergio Hassid; Georges Choufani; Veikko Jousmäki; Riitta Hari; Patrick Van Bogaert; Serge Goldman; Xavier De Tiège
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.