Literature DB >> 20660429

Manual skill generalization enhanced by negative viscosity.

Felix C Huang1, James L Patton, Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi.   

Abstract

Recent human-machine interaction studies have suggested that movement augmented with negative viscosity can enhance performance and can even promote better motor learning. To test this, we investigated how negative viscosity influences motor adaptation to an environment where forces acted only in one axis of motion. Using a force-feedback device, subjects performed free exploratory movements with a purely inertia generating forces proportional to hand acceleration, negative viscosity generating destabilizing forces proportional to hand velocity, or a combination of the acceleration and velocity fields. After training, we evaluated each subject's ability to perform circular movements in only the inertial field. Combined training resulted in lowest error and revealed similar responses as inertia training in catch trials. These findings are remarkable because negative viscosity, available only during training, evidently enhanced learning when combined with inertia. This success in generalization is consistent with the ability of the nervous system to decompose the perturbing forces into velocity and acceleration dependent components. Compared with inertia, the combined group exhibited a broader range of speeds along the direction of maximal perturbing force. Broader exploration was also correlated with better performance in subsequent evaluation trials; this suggests that negative viscosity improved performance by enhancing identification of each force field. These findings shed light on a new way to enhance sensorimotor adaptation through robot-applied augmentation of mechanics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20660429      PMCID: PMC2957452          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00433.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  49 in total

1.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 2.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning.

Authors:  M Kawato
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Kinematics and dynamics are not represented independently in motor working memory: evidence from an interference study.

Authors:  Christine Tong; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Robot-assisted adaptive training: custom force fields for teaching movement patterns.

Authors:  James L Patton; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  The interference effects of non-rotated versus counter-rotated trials in visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Mark R Hinder; Laura Walk; Daniel G Woolley; Stephan Riek; Richard G Carson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Endpoint stiffness of the arm is directionally tuned to instability in the environment.

Authors:  David W Franklin; Gary Liaw; Theodore E Milner; Rieko Osu; Etienne Burdet; Mitsuo Kawato
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Damping of the wrist joint during voluntary movement.

Authors:  T E Milner; C Cloutier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Modular decomposition in visuomotor learning.

Authors:  Z Ghahramani; D M Wolpert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-03-27       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Robot-assisted reaching exercise promotes arm movement recovery in chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Leonard E Kahn; Michele L Zygman; W Zev Rymer; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Human-robot cooperative movement training: learning a novel sensory motor transformation during walking with robotic assistance-as-needed.

Authors:  Jeremy L Emken; Raul Benitez; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of negative viscosity as upper extremity training for stroke survivors.

Authors:  Felix C Huang; James L Patton
Journal:  IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot       Date:  2011

2.  Augmented dynamics and motor exploration as training for stroke.

Authors:  Felix C Huang; James L Patton
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Individual patterns of motor deficits evident in movement distribution analysis.

Authors:  Felix C Huang; James L Patton
Journal:  IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot       Date:  2013-06

4.  Using dual tasks to test immediate transfer of training between naturalistic movements: a proof-of-principle study.

Authors:  Sydney Y Schaefer; Catherine E Lang
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  Effects of robotically modulating kinematic variability on motor skill learning and motivation.

Authors:  Jaime E Duarte; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Variable Damping Force Tunnel for Gait Training Using ALEX III.

Authors:  Paul Stegall; Damiano Zanotto; Sunil K Agrawal
Journal:  IEEE Robot Autom Lett       Date:  2017-02-17

7.  Simulation of variable impedance as an intervention for upper extremity motor exploration.

Authors:  Felix C Huang
Journal:  IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot       Date:  2017-07

8.  Movement distributions of stroke survivors exhibit distinct patterns that evolve with training.

Authors:  Felix C Huang; James L Patton
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  Learning to shape virtual patient locomotor patterns: internal representations adapt to exploit interactive dynamics.

Authors:  Christopher J Hasson; Sarah E Goodman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Effect of Position- and Velocity-Dependent Forces on Reaching Movements at Different Speeds.

Authors:  Susanna Summa; Maura Casadio; Vittorio Sanguineti
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.