Literature DB >> 22143901

Do action goals mediate social inhibition of return?

Geoff G Cole1, Paul A Skarratt, Rebeccah-Claire Billing.   

Abstract

Social inhibition of return is the phenomenon whereby an individual is slower to reach to locations to which another individual has recently responded. Although this suggests that an observer represents another person's action, little is known about which aspects of the action are encoded. The present work describes a series of three experiments examining whether social inhibition of return represents the endpoint goal of the action, i.e., is 'goal based'. Pairs of participants sat opposite to one another and alternated responses to a cued or non-cued object presented on a table top. Importantly, either the two participants performed the same interaction with the object or a different interaction. Although all our experiments showed social inhibition of return, the size of the effect was not modulated according to whether each participant had the same or different goal. We conclude that although the mechanisms giving rise to social inhibition of return do encode some aspects of a response they do not code for terminal action goals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22143901     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-011-0395-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  39 in total

1.  Inhibition of return is composed of attentional and oculomotor processes.

Authors:  A Kingstone; J Pratt
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-08

2.  On the strategic modulation of the time course of facilitation and inhibition of return.

Authors:  J Lupiáñez; B Milliken; C Solano; B Weaver; S P Tipper
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2001-08

3.  The role of response in spatial attention: direct versus indirect stimulus-response mappings.

Authors:  Shamima Khatoon; Kevin A Briand; Anne B Sereno
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  What the experimenter's prime tells the observer's brain.

Authors:  Geoff G Cole; Gustav Kuhn
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  M Eimer; F Schlaghecken
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  The Simon effect occurs relative to the direction of an attention shift.

Authors:  S Rubichi; R Nicoletti; C Iani; C Umiltà
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Does Joe influence Fred's action? Inhibition of return across different nervous systems.

Authors:  Timothy N Welsh; Digby Elliott; J Greg Anson; Victoria Dhillon; Daniel J Weeks; James L Lyons; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2005-09-09       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Coordinating cognition: the costs and benefits of shared gaze during collaborative search.

Authors:  Susan E Brennan; Xin Chen; Christopher A Dickinson; Mark B Neider; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-07-06

9.  Does Joe influence Fred's action? Not if Fred has autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Timothy N Welsh; Matthew C Ray; Daniel J Weeks; Deborah Dewey; Digby Elliott
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  On observing another person's actions: influences of observed inhibition and errors.

Authors:  Stefanie Schuch; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2007-07
View more
  8 in total

1.  Action or attention in social inhibition of return?

Authors:  Silviya P Doneva; Mark A Atkinson; Paul A Skarratt; Geoff G Cole
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-12-26

Review 2.  Visual attention and action: How cueing, direct mapping, and social interactions drive orienting.

Authors:  Mark A Atkinson; Andrew A Simpson; Geoff G Cole
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

3.  Response-specific effects in a joint action task: social inhibition of return effects do not emerge when observed and executed actions are different.

Authors:  Joseph Manzone; Geoff G Cole; Paul A Skarratt; Timothy N Welsh
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-08-16

4.  When your decisions are not (quite) your own: action observation influences free choices.

Authors:  Geoff G Cole; Damien Wright; Silviya P Doneva; Paul A Skarratt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Joint attention for stimuli on the hands: ownership matters.

Authors:  J E T Taylor; Jay Pratt; Jessica K Witt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-01

6.  Social Beliefs and Visual Attention: How the Social Relevance of a Cue Influences Spatial Orienting.

Authors:  Matthias S Gobel; Miles R A Tufft; Daniel C Richardson
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-11-02

7.  The role of attention in a joint-action effect.

Authors:  Silviya P Doneva; Geoff G Cole
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  "Two Minds Don't Blink Alike": The Attentional Blink Does Not Occur in a Joint Context.

Authors:  Merryn D Constable; Jay Pratt; Timothy N Welsh
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-09-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.