Literature DB >> 17328386

The number line effect reflects top-down control.

Jelena Ristic1, Alissa Wright, Alan Kingstone.   

Abstract

Recent evidence indicates that central directional stimuli, such as eyes and arrows, trigger rapid, reflexive shifts of spatial attention. A study by Fischer, Castel, Dodd, and Pratt (2003) suggested that a similar effect might also apply to central numbers, as if a digit's meaning causes attention to be oriented to its relative position on a left-to-right mental number line. However, unlike central eyes and arrows, the orienting effect for central digits emerges slowly, suggesting that top-down endogenous processes may be mediating this effect. Here, we report a series of three experiments that strongly support this hypothesis. Experiment 1 replicated Fischer et al.'s left-to-right number line effect. Experiment 2 showed that this effect could be completely reversed by merely asking participants to imagine a number line running from right to left. Experiment 3 showed that a left-to-right number line effect could be abolished by presenting targets above and below central fixation, as well as to the left and right of center. Experiment 3 also showed that other mental sets, such as imagining a clock, result in attention's being oriented in accordance with where the central digits are represented on a clock face. Together, these data indicate that the spatial representations and attentional orienting related to the perception of digits are both fragile and flexible and depend critically on the top-down spatial mental sets adopted by individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17328386     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  13 in total

1.  Inhibition of return is composed of attentional and oculomotor processes.

Authors:  A Kingstone; J Pratt
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-08

2.  You must see the point: automatic processing of cues to the direction of social attention.

Authors:  S R Langton; V Bruce
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention.

Authors:  Martin H Fischer; Alan D Castel; Michael D Dodd; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Number magnitude orients attention, but not against one's will.

Authors:  Giovanni Galfano; Elena Rusconi; Carlo Umiltà
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-10

5.  Taking control of reflexive social attention.

Authors:  Jelena Ristic; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-01

6.  Stimulus-response compatibility in representational space.

Authors:  D Bächtold; M Baumüller; P Brugger
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation.

Authors:  S Yantis; J Jonides
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Are eyes special? It depends on how you look at it.

Authors:  Jelena Ristic; Chris Kelland Friesen; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-09

9.  Orienting of attention.

Authors:  M I Posner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.143

10.  Attention and the detection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; C R Snyder; B J Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-06
View more
  31 in total

1.  Spatial biases in number line bisection tasks are due to a cognitive illusion of length.

Authors:  Elisabeth Stöttinger; Britt Anderson; James Danckert; Barbara Frühholz; Guilherme Wood
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Negative numbers eliminate, but do not reverse, the attentional SNARC effect.

Authors:  Michael D Dodd
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-04-10

3.  Dynamic mental number line in simple arithmetic.

Authors:  Xiaodan Yu; Jie Liu; Dawei Li; Hang Liu; Jiaxin Cui; Xinlin Zhou
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-12-08

4.  Voluntary eye movements direct attention on the mental number space.

Authors:  Mariagrazia Ranzini; Matteo Lisi; Marco Zorzi
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-02-02

5.  Number magnitude orients attention, but not against one's will.

Authors:  Giovanni Galfano; Elena Rusconi; Carlo Umiltà
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-10

6.  Attentional control and reflexive orienting to gaze and arrow cues.

Authors:  Jelena Ristic; Alissa Wright; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

7.  Look, no hands: a perceptual task shows that number magnitude induces shifts of attention.

Authors:  Michael E R Nicholls; Andrea M Loftus; Wim Gevers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-04

8.  Addition goes where the big numbers are: evidence for a reversed operational momentum effect.

Authors:  Michal Pinhas; Samuel Shaki; Martin H Fischer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08

9.  The effect of working memory load on the SNARC effect: Maybe tasks have a word to say.

Authors:  Zhijun Deng; Yinghe Chen; Xiaoshuang Zhu; Yanjun Li
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-04

Review 10.  The spatial representation of numbers: evidence from neglect and pseudoneglect.

Authors:  Carlo Umiltà; Konstantinos Priftis; Marco Zorzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.