Literature DB >> 12026955

Inhibition of return in static and dynamic displays.

Shawn E Christ1, Christina S McCrae, Richard A Abrams.   

Abstract

Inhibition of return (IOR) causes people to be slower to return their attention to a recently attended object (object-based IOR) or location (location-based IOR). In attempts to separately measure the two components, moving stimuli have been used that permit the dissociation of the attended object from its location when it was attended. The implicit assumption has been that both object- and location-based components of IOR will operate whenever the cued object and cued location are identical. We show here that although this assumption may be true in a static display, it appears to be unwarranted when moving stimuli are involved: Very little IOR is observed when a cued object moves away from, and then subsequently returns to, its initial location. Thus, the processes that underlie IOR operate very differently in static versus dynamic scenes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12026955     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  12 in total

1.  Inhibition of return is composed of attentional and oculomotor processes.

Authors:  A Kingstone; J Pratt
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-08

2.  Inhibition of return in spatial attention: direct evidence for collicular generation.

Authors:  A Sapir; N Soroker; A Berger; A Henik
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  The effects of practice on object-based, location-based, and static-display inhibition of return.

Authors:  B Weaver; J Lupiáñez; F L Watson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1998-08

4.  Aging and movement: variability of force pulses for saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  R A Abrams; J Pratt; A L Chasteen
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1998-09

5.  Inhibition of return in location- and identity-based choice decision tasks.

Authors:  J Pratt; A Kingstone; W Khoe
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1997-08

6.  Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention.

Authors:  S P Tipper; B Weaver; L M Jerreat; A L Burak
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Inhibition of return: effects of attentional cuing on eye movement latencies.

Authors:  R A Abrams; R S Dobkin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The role of the monkey superior colliculus in eye movement and vision.

Authors:  P H Schiller
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol       Date:  1972-06

9.  Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations.

Authors:  R D Rafal; P A Calabresi; C W Brennan; T K Sciolto
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Object-based facilitation and inhibition from visual orienting in the human split-brain.

Authors:  S P Tipper; R Rafal; P A Reuter-Lorenz; Y Starrveldt; T Ro; R Egly; S Danzinger; B Weaver
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  4 in total

1.  Age differences in enumerating things that move: implications for the development of multiple-object tracking.

Authors:  Lana M Trick; Diana Audet; Lynn Dales
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-12

2.  Abrupt onsets cannot be ignored.

Authors:  Shawn E Christ; Richard A Abrams
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-10

3.  Inhibition of return and object-based attentional selection.

Authors:  Alexandra List; Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The timecourse of space- and object-based attentional prioritization with varying degrees of certainty.

Authors:  Leslie Drummond; Sarah Shomstein
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.