Literature DB >> 10468592

Genetic benefits enhance the reproductive success of polyandrous females.

S D Newcomer1, J A Zeh, D W Zeh.   

Abstract

Although it is generally accepted that females can gain material benefits by mating with more than one male, the proposal that polyandry provides genetic benefits remains controversial, largely because direct experimental support is lacking. Here, we report the results of a study testing for genetic benefits to polyandry in the pseudoscorpion Cordylochernes scorpioides. In an experiment that controlled for male mating experience and the number of spermatophores accepted by a female, twice-mated females received either one sperm-packet from each of two different males (the "DM" treatment) or two sperm-packets from a single male (the same male or "SM" treatment). Over their lifetime, DM females gave birth to 32% more offspring than did SM females, primarily because of a significantly reduced rate of spontaneous abortion. This result could not be attributed to male infertility nor to lack of sexual receptivity in males paired with previous mates. Spermatophore and sperm numbers did not differ between males presented with a previous mate and males paired with a new female. Because SM and DM females received the same quantity of ejaculate, it was possible to eliminate material benefits as a contributor to the enhanced reproductive success of DM females. The reduction in embryo failure rate achieved by DM females is most consistent with the genetic incompatibility avoidance hypothesis, i.e., that polyandry enables females to exploit postcopulatory mechanisms for reducing the risk and/or cost of fertilization by genetically incompatible sperm. This study, which rigorously controlled for material benefits and excluded inbreeding effects, demonstrates that polyandry provides genetic benefits that significantly enhance female lifetime reproductive success.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10468592      PMCID: PMC17872          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.18.10236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  9 in total

1.  Polyandrous females discriminate against previous mates.

Authors:  J A Zeh; S D Newcomer; D W Zeh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-11-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The `genetic benefits' of female multiple mating reconsidered.

Authors:  Y Yasui
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-06-01       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Theories of sexual selection.

Authors:  J M Smith
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Postcopulatory sexual selection in an arctiid moth (Utetheisa ornatrix).

Authors:  C W LaMunyon; T Eisner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-05-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products.

Authors:  T Chapman; L F Liddle; J M Kalb; M F Wolfner; L Partridge
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-01-19       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Charomid cloning vectors meet the pedipalpal chelae: single-locus minisatellite DNA probes for paternity assignment in the harlequin beetle-riding pseudoscorpion.

Authors:  D W Zeh; J A Zeh; C A May
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  No evidence of sperm selection by female common shrews.

Authors:  P Stockley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Multiple mating in wild Drosophila melanogaster revisited by microsatellite analysis.

Authors:  M Imhof; B Harr; G Brem; C Schlötterer
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 6.185

9.  Sexually transmitted chemical defense in a moth (Utetheisa ornatrix).

Authors:  A González; C Rossini; M Eisner; T Eisner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

  9 in total
  27 in total

1.  Polyandry in a marine turtle: females make the best of a bad job.

Authors:  Patricia L M Lee; Graeme C Hays
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-04-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  No discrimination against previous mates in a sexually cannibalistic spider.

Authors:  Lutz Fromhage; Jutta M Schneider
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2005-10-28

Review 3.  Selfish genetic elements and sexual selection: their impact on male fertility.

Authors:  Tom A R Price; Nina Wedell
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-03-08       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  Maternal inheritance, epigenetics and the evolution of polyandry.

Authors:  Jeanne A Zeh; David W Zeh
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 1.082

5.  Sisters' curse: sexually antagonistic effects constrain the spread of a mitochondrial haplogroup superior in sperm competition.

Authors:  Michael V Padua; David W Zeh; Melvin M Bonilla; Jeanne A Zeh
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  How multiple mating by females affects sexual selection.

Authors:  Stephen M Shuster; William R Briggs; Patricia A Dennis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Reproductive compensation favours male-killing Wolbachia in a live-bearing host.

Authors:  Julie L Koop; David W Zeh; Melvin M Bonilla; Jeanne A Zeh
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Females prefer carotenoid colored males as mates in the pentamorphic livebearing fish, Poecilia parae.

Authors:  Godfrey R Bourne; Felix Breden; Teresa C Allen
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2003-08-28

9.  Consistent paternity skew through ontogeny in Peron's tree frog (Litoria peronii).

Authors:  Craig D H Sherman; Erik Wapstra; Mats Olsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Genetic and potential non-genetic benefits increase offspring fitness of polyandrous females in non-resource based mating system.

Authors:  Jukka Kekäläinen; Geir Rudolfsen; Matti Janhunen; Lars Figenschou; Nina Peuhkuri; Niina Tamper; Raine Kortet
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.