Literature DB >> 21232444

Theories of sexual selection.

J M Smith1.   

Abstract

Recent research on sexual selection in animals has begun to indicate that 'handicaps' and 'honest signalling' may play more important roles than hitherto thought. This review reappraises theories of sexual selection in the light of these new developments.
Copyright © 1991. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Year:  1991        PMID： 21232444     DOI： 10.1016/0169-5347(91)90055-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN： 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  26 in total

1.  Genetic benefits enhance the reproductive success of polyandrous females.

Authors:  S D Newcomer; J A Zeh; D W Zeh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-31       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Phenotypic plasticity of Rhyzopertha dominica pheromone signaling: the effects of different hosts and presence of conspecific females on male produced aggregation pheromone.

Authors:  T Bashir; R J Hodges; L A Birkinshaw; D R Hall; D I Farman
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 3.  Sensory exploitation and sexual conflict.

Authors:  Göran Arnqvist
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  The mitonuclear compatibility hypothesis of sexual selection.

Authors:  Geoffrey E Hill; James D Johnson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Male genital modification : A sexual selection interpretation.

Authors:  R Rowanchilde
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1996-06

Review 6.  Mate choice and sexual selection: what have we learned since Darwin?

Authors:  Adam G Jones; Nicholas L Ratterman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Beyond artificial, sex-linked distinctions to conceptualize female sexuality: comment on Baumeister (2000)

Authors:  B L Andersen; J M Cyranowski; S Aarestad
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Polyandrous females discriminate against previous mates.

Authors:  J A Zeh; S D Newcomer; D W Zeh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-11-10       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The shape of female mating preferences.

Authors:  M G Ritchie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The strength of indirect selection on female mating preferences.

Authors:  M Kirkpatrick; N H Barton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-02-18       Impact factor: 11.205
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.