Literature DB >> 9811869

Polyandrous females discriminate against previous mates.

J A Zeh1, S D Newcomer, D W Zeh.   

Abstract

In most animal species, particularly those in which females engage in polyandry, mate choice is a sequential process in which a female must choose to mate or not to mate with each male encountered. Although a number of theoretical and empirical investigations have examined the effects of sequential mate choice on the operation of sexual selection, how females respond to solicitation by previous mates has received little attention. Here, we report the results of a study carried out on the polyandrous pseudoscorpion, Cordylochernes scorpioides, that assessed the sexual receptivity of once-mated females presented after a lapse of 1.5 hr or 48 hr with either their first mate or a different male. Females exhibited a high level of receptivity to new males, irrespective of intermating interval. By contrast, time between matings exerted a strong effect on female receptivity to previous mates. After a lapse of 48 hr, females did not differ significantly in their receptivity toward previous mates and different males, whereas at 1.5 hr after first mating, females were almost invariably unreceptive to males from whom they had previously accepted sperm. This result could not be attributed to male size or mating experience or to male sexual receptivity. Indeed, males were as willing to transfer sperm to a previous mate as they were to a new female. This difference between males and females in their propensity to remate with the same individual may reflect a conflict between the sexes, with males seeking to minimize postcopulatory sexual selection and females actively keeping open the opportunity for sperm competition and female choice of sperm by discriminating against previous mates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9811869      PMCID: PMC24888          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.23.13732

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  9 in total

1.  Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits.

Authors:  R Lande
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Foraging advantage of polyandry for female sierra dome spiders (Linyphia litigiosa: Linyphiidae) and assessment of alternative direct benefit hypoteses.

Authors:  P J Watson
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Female promiscuity and genetic incompatibility.

Authors:  M D Jennions
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Theories of sexual selection.

Authors:  J M Smith
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Why do females copulate repeatedly with one male?

Authors:  F M Hunter; M Petrie; M Otronen; T Birkhead; A Pape Møller
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 6.  Sexual selection, honest advertisement and the handicap principle: reviewing the evidence.

Authors:  R A Johnstone
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  1995-02

7.  Postcopulatory sexual selection in an arctiid moth (Utetheisa ornatrix).

Authors:  C W LaMunyon; T Eisner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-05-15       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products.

Authors:  T Chapman; L F Liddle; J M Kalb; M F Wolfner; L Partridge
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-01-19       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Charomid cloning vectors meet the pedipalpal chelae: single-locus minisatellite DNA probes for paternity assignment in the harlequin beetle-riding pseudoscorpion.

Authors:  D W Zeh; J A Zeh; C A May
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 6.185

  9 in total
  16 in total

1.  Genetic benefits enhance the reproductive success of polyandrous females.

Authors:  S D Newcomer; J A Zeh; D W Zeh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-31       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Females use self-referent cues to avoid mating with previous mates.

Authors:  Tracie M Ivy; Carie B Weddle; Scott K Sakaluk
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  No discrimination against previous mates in a sexually cannibalistic spider.

Authors:  Lutz Fromhage; Jutta M Schneider
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2005-10-28

4.  Variation in preference for a male ornament is positively associated with female eyespan in the stalk-eyed fly Diasemopsis meigenii.

Authors:  Samuel Cotton; David W Rogers; Jennifer Small; Andrew Pomiankowski; Kevin Fowler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Drosophila melanogaster virgins are more likely to mate with strangers than familiar flies.

Authors:  Anders Odeen; Clea M Moray
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2007-09-26

6.  Maternal inheritance, epigenetics and the evolution of polyandry.

Authors:  Jeanne A Zeh; David W Zeh
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 1.082

7.  Sisters' curse: sexually antagonistic effects constrain the spread of a mitochondrial haplogroup superior in sperm competition.

Authors:  Michael V Padua; David W Zeh; Melvin M Bonilla; Jeanne A Zeh
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  How multiple mating by females affects sexual selection.

Authors:  Stephen M Shuster; William R Briggs; Patricia A Dennis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Sperm competitive advantage of a rare mitochondrial haplogroup linked to differential expression of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation genes.

Authors:  Jeanne A Zeh; Maya A Zawlodzki; Melvin M Bonilla; Eleanor J Su-Keene; Michael V Padua; David W Zeh
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2019-09-22       Impact factor: 2.411

10.  No effect of mate novelty on sexual motivation in the freshwater snail Biomphalaria glabrata.

Authors:  Ines K Häderer; Johanna Werminghausen; Nils Anthes; Nico K Michiels; Nadine Timmermeyer
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 3.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.