Literature DB >> 17705058

Maternal inheritance, epigenetics and the evolution of polyandry.

Jeanne A Zeh1, David W Zeh.   

Abstract

Growing evidence indicates that females actively engage in polyandry either to avoid genetic incompatibility or to bias paternity in favor of genetically superior males. Despite empirical support for the intrinsic male quality hypothesis, the maintenance of variation in male fitness remains a conundrum for traditional "good genes" models of sexual selection. Here, we discuss two mechanisms of non-Mendelian inheritance, maternal inheritance of mitochondria and epigenetic regulation of gene expression, which may explain the persistence of variation in male fitness traits important in post-copulatory sexual selection. The inability of males to transmit mitochondria precludes any direct evolutionary response to selection on mitochondrial mutations that reduce or enhance male fitness. Consequently, mitochondrial-based variation in sperm traits is likely to persist, even in the face of intense sperm competition. Indeed, mitochondrial nucleotide substitutions, deletions and insertions are now known to be a primary cause of low sperm count and poor sperm motility in humans. Paradoxically, in the field of sexual selection, female-limited response to selection has been largely overlooked. Similarly, the contribution of epigenetics (e.g., DNA methylation, histone modifications and non-coding RNAs) to heritable variation in male fitness has received little attention from evolutionary theorists. Unlike DNA sequence based variation, epigenetic variation can be strongly influenced by environmental and stochastic effects experienced during the lifetime of an individual. Remarkably, in some cases, acquired epigenetic changes can be stably transmitted to offspring. A recent study indicates that sperm exhibit particularly high levels of epigenetic variation both within and between individuals. We suggest that such epigenetic variation may have important implications for post-copulatory sexual selection and may account for recent findings linking sperm competitive ability to offspring fitness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17705058     DOI: 10.1007/s10709-007-9192-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  97 in total

1.  Mitochondrial mutations may decrease population viability.

Authors:  N J. Gemmell; F W. Allendorf
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Polyandrous females avoid costs of inbreeding.

Authors:  Tom Tregenza; Nina Wedell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-03       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Sperm mobility: mechanisms of fertilizing efficiency, genetic variation and phenotypic relationship with male status in the domestic fowl, Gallus gallus domesticus.

Authors:  David P Froman; Tommaso Pizzari; Allen J Feltmann; Hector Castillo-Juarez; Tim R Birkhead
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Sexually antagonistic cytonuclear fitness interactions in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  D M Rand; A G Clark; L M Kann
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Sperm viability matters in insect sperm competition.

Authors:  Francisco García-González; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-02-08       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Sexy sons: a dead end for cytoplasmic genes.

Authors:  Jeanne A Zeh
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Evolutionary consequences of intracellular organelle competition.

Authors:  W G Eberhard
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 4.875

8.  Mitochondria-related male infertility.

Authors:  Kazuto Nakada; Akitsugu Sato; Kayo Yoshida; Takashi Morita; Hiromitsu Tanaka; Shin-Ichi Inoue; Hiromichi Yonekawa; Jun-Ichi Hayashi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Females increase offspring heterozygosity and fitness through extra-pair matings.

Authors:  Katharina Foerster; Kaspar Delhey; Arild Johnsen; Jan T Lifjeld; Bart Kempenaers
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-10-16       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  15 in total

1.  One- and two-locus population models with differential viability between sexes: parallels between haploid parental selection and genomic imprinting.

Authors:  Alexey Yanchukov
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-05-17       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  An introduction to genetic quality in the context of sexual selection.

Authors:  Trevor E Pitcher; Herman L Mays
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  Consistent male-male paternity differences across female genotypes.

Authors:  Craig D H Sherman; Erik Wapstra; Mats Olsson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 4.  Inheritance is where physiology meets evolution.

Authors:  Etienne Danchin; Arnaud Pocheville
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Evidence that fertility trades off with early offspring fitness as males age.

Authors:  Sheri L Johnson; Sylvia Zellhuber-McMillan; Joanne Gillum; Jessica Dunleavy; Jonathan P Evans; Shinichi Nakagawa; Neil J Gemmell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  The sex lives of parasites: investigating the mating system and mechanisms of sexual selection of the human pathogen Schistosoma mansoni.

Authors:  Michelle L Steinauer
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 3.981

7.  Inbreeding avoidance drives consistent variation of fine-scale genetic structure caused by dispersal in the seasonal mating system of Brandt's voles.

Authors:  Xiao Hui Liu; Ling Fen Yue; Da Wei Wang; Ning Li; Lin Cong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Polyandry and sex-specific gene expression.

Authors:  Judith E Mank; Nina Wedell; David J Hosken
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Fertilization is not a new beginning: the relationship between sperm longevity and offspring performance.

Authors:  Angela J Crean; John M Dwyer; Dustin J Marshall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The relative nature of fertilization success: implications for the study of post-copulatory sexual selection.

Authors:  Francisco García-González
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.