Literature DB >> 21666760

Individual Differences in Effectiveness of Cochlear Implants in Children Who Are Prelingually Deaf: New Process Measures of Performance.

David B Pisoni1, Miranda Cleary, Ann E Geers, Emily A Tobey.   

Abstract

The efficacy of cochlear implants in children who are deaf has been firmly established in the literature. However, the effectiveness of cochlear implants varies widely and is influenced by demographic and experiential factors. Several key findings suggest new directions for research on central auditory factors that underlie the effectiveness of cochlear implants. First, enormous individual differences have been observed in both adults and children on a wide range of audiological outcome measures. Some patients show large increases in speech perception scores after implantation, whereas others display only modest gains on standardized tests. Second, age of implantation and length of deafness affect all outcome measures. Children implanted at younger ages do better than children implanted at older ages, and children who have been deaf for shorter periods do better than children who have been deaf for longer periods. Third, communication mode affects outcome measures. Children from "oral-only" environments do much better on standardized tests that assess phonological processing skills than children who use Total Communication. Fourth, at the present time there are no preimplant predictors of outcome performance in young children. The underlying perceptual, cognitive, and linguistic abilities and skills emerge after implantation and improve over time. Finally, there are no significant differences in audiological outcome measures among current implant devices or processing strategies. This finding suggests that the major source of variance in outcome measures lies in the neural and cognitive information processing operations that the user applies to the signal provided by the implant. Taken together, this overall pattern of results suggests that higher-level central processes such as perception, attention, learning, and memory may play important roles in explaining the large individual differences observed among users of cochlear implants. Investigations of the content and flow of information in the central nervous system and interactions between sensory input and stored knowledge may provide important new insights into the basis of individual differences. Knowledge about the underlying basis of individual differences may also help in developing new intervention strategies to improve the effectiveness of cochlear implants in children who show relatively poor development of oral/aural language skills.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 21666760      PMCID: PMC3115548     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Volta Rev        ISSN: 0042-8639


  37 in total

1.  The neuromuscular control of birdsong.

Authors:  R A Suthers; F Goller; C Pytte
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1999-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Cognitive factors and cochlear implants: some thoughts on perception, learning, and memory in speech perception.

Authors:  D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Two separate verbal processing rates contributing to short-term memory span.

Authors:  N Cowan; N L Wood; P K Wood; T A Keller; L D Nugent; C V Keller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1998-06

4.  Phonological short-term memory and new word learning in children.

Authors:  S E Gathercole; G J Hitch; E Service; A J Martin
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  1997-11

5.  A picture identification test for hearing-impaired children.

Authors:  M Ross; J Lerman
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1970-03

6.  Multivariate predictors of audiological success with multichannel cochlear implants.

Authors:  B J Gantz; G G Woodworth; J F Knutson; P J Abbas; R S Tyler
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 1.547

7.  Cochlear implants in young children: the relationship between speech perception and speech intelligibility.

Authors:  G M O'Donoghue; T P Nikolopoulos; S M Archbold; M Tait
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children.

Authors:  J Bench; A Kowal; J Bamford
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1979-08

9.  Auditory neurophysiologic responses and discrimination deficits in children with learning problems.

Authors:  N Kraus; T J McGee; T D Carrell; S G Zecker; T G Nicol; D B Koch
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-08-16       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Short-term memory capacity: magic number or magic spell?

Authors:  R Schweickert; B Boruff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  36 in total

1.  Use of audiovisual information in speech perception by prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants: a first report.

Authors:  L Lachs; D B Pisoni; K I Kirk
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Imitation of nonwords by deaf children after cochlear implantation: preliminary findings.

Authors:  Miranda Cleary; Caitlin Dillon; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  2002-05

3.  Speech timing and working memory in profoundly deaf children after cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Rose A Burkholder; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2003-05

4.  Influence of DFNB1 status on expressive language in deaf children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Simon I Angeli; Hamlet Suarez; Alina Lopez; Thomas J Balkany; Xue Z Liu
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Preschool speech intelligibility and vocabulary skills predict long-term speech and language outcomes following cochlear implantation in early childhood.

Authors:  Irina Castellanos; William G Kronenberger; Jessica Beer; Shirley C Henning; Bethany G Colson; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2013-11-25

6.  Development of audiovisual comprehension skills in prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Tonya R Bergeson; David B Pisoni; Rebecca A O Davis
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Effects of a cochlear implant simulation on immediate memory in normal-hearing adults.

Authors:  Rose A Burkholder; David B Pisoni; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.117

8.  Some measures of verbal and spatial working memory in eight- and nine-year-old hearing-impaired children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  M Cleary; D B Pisoni; A E Geers
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Development of visual attention skills in prelingually deaf children who use cochlear implants.

Authors:  D L Horn; R A O Davis; D B Pisoni; R T Miyamoto
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Information-processing skills of deaf children with cochlear implants: some new process measures of performance.

Authors:  David B Pisoni
Journal:  Int Congr Ser       Date:  2004-10-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.