UNLABELLED: It has been shown in clinical studies that for subjects with a low likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD), attenuation correction (AC) improves the specificity of defect detection in the inferior wall (right coronary artery [RCA] region). The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of AC on the visual interpretation of the RCA and anteroseptal (corresponding to the left anterior descending artery [LAD]) regions in CAD patients. METHODS: Fifty-six patients with suspected CAD underwent 20Tl stress/4 h-delayed imaging SPECT using a simultaneous 201Tl emission/99mTc transmission imaging protocol. Images were reconstructed using the maximum likelihood-expectation maximum algorithm without and with AC. The stress/4 h-delayed images were interpreted blindly for reversible or fixed defects in the RCA and LAD regions by three experienced physicians. Coronary angiography, electrocardiography and enzyme findings were used to establish diagnoses of ischemia or infarction, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed. RESULTS: Statistical testing of ROC curve areas showed that defect detection performance improved with AC when compared with performance without AC in the RCA region. This was mainly the result of a systematic increase in specificity of 12% or more (for any observer and any type of defect) for a similar sensitivity (no definite change in sensitivity values). However, defect detection performance significantly decreased in the LAD territory with AC images (P < 0.05) because of a systematic decrease in sensitivity of 20% or more, with no consistent change in specificity. Similar trends were observed when reversible and fixed defects were considered separately. CONCLUSION: AC significantly affects the visual interpretation of 201Tl stress/4 h-delayed SPECT images. This study confirmed the increase in specificity obtained with AC in the RCA territory. However, in the population considered, the studied AC was deleterious for the LAD territory assessment.
UNLABELLED: It has been shown in clinical studies that for subjects with a low likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD), attenuation correction (AC) improves the specificity of defect detection in the inferior wall (right coronary artery [RCA] region). The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of AC on the visual interpretation of the RCA and anteroseptal (corresponding to the left anterior descending artery [LAD]) regions in CAD patients. METHODS: Fifty-six patients with suspected CAD underwent 20Tl stress/4 h-delayed imaging SPECT using a simultaneous 201Tl emission/99mTc transmission imaging protocol. Images were reconstructed using the maximum likelihood-expectation maximum algorithm without and with AC. The stress/4 h-delayed images were interpreted blindly for reversible or fixed defects in the RCA and LAD regions by three experienced physicians. Coronary angiography, electrocardiography and enzyme findings were used to establish diagnoses of ischemia or infarction, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed. RESULTS: Statistical testing of ROC curve areas showed that defect detection performance improved with AC when compared with performance without AC in the RCA region. This was mainly the result of a systematic increase in specificity of 12% or more (for any observer and any type of defect) for a similar sensitivity (no definite change in sensitivity values). However, defect detection performance significantly decreased in the LAD territory with AC images (P < 0.05) because of a systematic decrease in sensitivity of 20% or more, with no consistent change in specificity. Similar trends were observed when reversible and fixed defects were considered separately. CONCLUSION:AC significantly affects the visual interpretation of 201Tl stress/4 h-delayed SPECT images. This study confirmed the increase in specificity obtained with AC in the RCA territory. However, in the population considered, the studied AC was deleterious for the LAD territory assessment.
Authors: Robert C Hendel; James R Corbett; S James Cullom; E Gordon DePuey; Ernest V Garcia; Timothy M Bateman Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2002 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Riemer H J A Slart; Tjin H Que; Dirk J van Veldhuisen; Lieke Poot; Paul K Blanksma; D Albert Piers; Pieter L Jager Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2003-08-27 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: B Hesse; K Tägil; A Cuocolo; C Anagnostopoulos; M Bardiés; J Bax; F Bengel; E Busemann Sokole; G Davies; M Dondi; L Edenbrandt; P Franken; A Kjaer; J Knuuti; M Lassmann; M Ljungberg; C Marcassa; P Y Marie; F McKiddie; M O'Connor; E Prvulovich; R Underwood; B van Eck-Smit Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Yasmin Masood; Yi-Hwa Liu; Gordon Depuey; Raymond Taillefer; Luis I Araujo; Steven Allen; Dominique Delbeke; Frank Anstett; Aharon Peretz; Mary-Jo Zito; Vera Tsatkin; Frans J Th Wackers Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2005 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Mathew Shotwell; Balkrishna M Singh; Charlotte Fortman; Brian D Bauman; Jennifer Lukes; Myron C Gerson Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2002 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Alexander G Pitman; Victor Kalff; Bruce Van Every; Borghild Risa; Leighton R Barnden; Michael J Kelly Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2005 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Gary V Heller; Timothy M Bateman; Lynne L Johnson; S James Cullom; James A Case; James R Galt; Ernest V Garcia; Keith Haddock; Kelly L Moutray; Carlos Poston; Eli H Botvinick; Matthews B Fish; William P Follansbee; Sean Hayes; Ami E Iskandrian; John J Mahmarian; William Vandecker Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2004 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.952