PURPOSE: We have assessed whether additional upright imaging increases the confidence of interpretation of stress only supine myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) in obese patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Tc-MIBI stress MPI of 101 consecutive patients (M = 49, 62 ± 12 years) with BMI ≥30 scanned on the D-SPECT cardiac camera were assessed. Images were interpreted as diagnostic or equivocal and the need for a rest study was recorded. Stress supine MPI was interpreted first, then gated and finally upright data were added. Defects on supine but not on upright were defined as artefacts and defects seen on both as abnormal. The total perfusion deficit (TPD) was also quantified. There were 27 normal, 22 abnormal, and 52 equivocal supine scans. The median EF was 52%, unaffecting the need for rest imaging. Upright imaging reclassified 32/52 (62%) equivocal studies as normal and 6/52 (11%) as abnormal (P < 0.001). Rest scan was deemed needed in 74/101 patients on supine vs 42/101 on supine/upright (P < 0.001). Supine TPD was normal in 53 and supine/upright TPD was normal in 70 patients (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Supine stress MPI is inadequate in obese patients. The addition of upright imaging significantly increases the ability to interpret scans as diagnostic and may reduce considerably the need for rest imaging.
PURPOSE: We have assessed whether additional upright imaging increases the confidence of interpretation of stress only supine myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) in obesepatients. METHODS AND RESULTS:Tc-MIBIstress MPI of 101 consecutive patients (M = 49, 62 ± 12 years) with BMI ≥30 scanned on the D-SPECT cardiac camera were assessed. Images were interpreted as diagnostic or equivocal and the need for a rest study was recorded. Stress supine MPI was interpreted first, then gated and finally upright data were added. Defects on supine but not on upright were defined as artefacts and defects seen on both as abnormal. The total perfusion deficit (TPD) was also quantified. There were 27 normal, 22 abnormal, and 52 equivocal supine scans. The median EF was 52%, unaffecting the need for rest imaging. Upright imaging reclassified 32/52 (62%) equivocal studies as normal and 6/52 (11%) as abnormal (P < 0.001). Rest scan was deemed needed in 74/101 patients on supine vs 42/101 on supine/upright (P < 0.001). Supine TPD was normal in 53 and supine/upright TPD was normal in 70 patients (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Supine stress MPI is inadequate in obesepatients. The addition of upright imaging significantly increases the ability to interpret scans as diagnostic and may reduce considerably the need for rest imaging.
Authors: Piotr J Slomka; Hidetaka Nishina; Daniel S Berman; Cigdem Akincioglu; Aiden Abidov; John D Friedman; Sean W Hayes; Guido Germano Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2005 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Sanjiv S Gambhir; Daniel S Berman; Jack Ziffer; Michael Nagler; Martin Sandler; Jim Patton; Brian Hutton; Tali Sharir; Shlomo Ben Haim; Simona Ben Haim Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Ryo Nakazato; Balaji K Tamarappoo; Xingping Kang; Arik Wolak; Faith Kite; Sean W Hayes; Louise E J Thomson; John D Friedman; Daniel S Berman; Piotr J Slomka Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2010-10-18 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Shishir Mathur; Gary V Heller; Timothy M Bateman; Richard Ruffin; Arshad Yekta; Deborah Katten; Nitya Alluri; Alan W Ahlberg Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2012-11-28 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Sharmila Dorbala; Karthik Ananthasubramaniam; Ian S Armstrong; Panithaya Chareonthaitawee; E Gordon DePuey; Andrew J Einstein; Robert J Gropler; Thomas A Holly; John J Mahmarian; Mi-Ae Park; Donna M Polk; Raymond Russell; Piotr J Slomka; Randall C Thompson; R Glenn Wells Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Brian G Abbott; James A Case; Sharmila Dorbala; Andrew J Einstein; James R Galt; Robert Pagnanelli; Renée P Bullock-Palmer; Prem Soman; R Glenn Wells Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 5.952