Literature DB >> 25709913

Eye rubbing-induced changes in intraocular pressure and corneal thickness measured at five locations, in subjects with ocular allergy.

Uchechukwu L Osuagwu1, Saud A Alanazi2.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess the effects of eye rubbing on corneal thickness (CT) and intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained 0-30min after habitual eye rubbing in symptomatic patients.
METHODS: Measurements of IOP and CT were obtained at five locations (central, temporal, superior, nasal and inferior) before, and every 5min for 30min interval after 30s of eye rubbing, for 25 randomly selected eyes of 14 subjects with ocular allergy and 11 age-matched normals. Differences in measurements were calculated in each group [Baseline measurements minus measurements recorded at each time interval after eye rubbing (for IOP), and for each corneal location (for CT)] and comparison were then made between groups (allergic versus control) for differences in any observed effects.
RESULTS: Within groups, baseline mean IOPs in the allergic patient-group (14.2±3.0 mm Hg) and in the control group (13.1±1.9 mm Hg) were similar at all times, after eye rubbing (P >0.05, for all). The maximum reduction in IOP was 0.8 mm Hg in the control subjects and the maximum increase was also 0.8 mm Hg in the allergic subjects. Between groups (allergic versus control), the changes in IOP remained under 1 mm Hg at all times (P=0.2) after 30min of eye rubbing. Between 0 and 30min of CT measurements after eye rubbing, the mean central CT (CCT), inferior CT (ICT), superior CT (SCT), temporal CT (TCT) and nasal CT (NCT) did not vary significantly from baseline values in the control and allergic-subject groups (P>0.05, for both). Between both groups, changes in CT were similar at all locations (P>0.05) except for the TC which was minimally thinner by about 4.4 µm (P=0.001) in the allergic subjects than in the control subjects, 30min following 30s of eye rubbing.
CONCLUSION: IOP measured in allergic subjects after 30s of habitual eye rubbing was comparable with that obtained in normal subjects at all times between 0 and 30min. Although, CT in the allergic subjects were similar to those of the control subjects at all times, it varied between +10 and -7.5 µm following eye rubbing, with the temporal cornea showing consistent reductions in thickness in the subjects with allergy. However, this reduction was minimal and was considered to not be clinically relevant.

Entities:  

Keywords:  allergy; corneal thickness; eye rubbing; intraocular pressure; pachymetry; tonometry

Year:  2015        PMID: 25709913      PMCID: PMC4325247          DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2015.01.15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  31 in total

1.  Orbscan pachymetry: implications of a repeated measures and diurnal variation analysis.

Authors:  M R Lattimore; S Kaupp; S Schallhorn; R Lewis
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Contact lenses in treatment of keratoconus.

Authors:  F RIDLEY
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1956-05       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Epithelial responses to rubbing-related mechanical forces.

Authors:  Charles W McMonnies; Ahmed Alharbi; Gavin C Boneham
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.651

4.  The effects of short-term lens wear and eye rubbing on the corneal epithelium.

Authors:  Gregory Kalogeropoulos; Shaun Chang; Thomas Bolton; Isabelle Jalbert
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.018

5.  Effects of eye rubbing and breath holding on corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure.

Authors:  Wan-Cherng Liu; Shui-Mei Lee; Andrew D Graham; Meng C Lin
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.651

6.  Tonometry and tonography.

Authors:  J Gloster
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol Clin       Date:  1965-12

7.  The distribution of corneal thickness in a 40- to 64-year-old population of Shahroud, Iran.

Authors:  Hassan Hashemi; Soheila Asgari; Shiva Mehravaran; Mohammad Hassan Emamian; Mohammad Shariati; Akbar Fotouhi
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 8.  Mechanisms of rubbing-related corneal trauma in keratoconus.

Authors:  Charles W McMonnies
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 9.  Management of chronic habits of abnormal eye rubbing.

Authors:  Charles W McMonnies
Journal:  Cont Lens Anterior Eye       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 3.077

10.  Corneal biomechanical parameters and intraocular pressure: the effect of topical anesthesia.

Authors:  Kelechi C Ogbuehi
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-06-15
View more
  6 in total

1.  The Magnitude of Intraocular Pressure Elevation Associated with Eye Rubbing.

Authors:  Daniel C Turner; Christopher A Girkin; J Crawford Downs
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Bilateral Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy Caused by Eye Rubbing.

Authors:  Alfonso Savastano; Maria Cristina Savastano; Laura Carlomusto; Silvio Savastano
Journal:  Case Rep Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-09-02

3.  A randomized, fellow eye, comparison of keratometry, aberrometry, tear film, axial length and the anterior chamber depth after eye rubbing in non-keratoconic eyes.

Authors:  Jordan V Chervenkoff; Elizabeth Hawkes; Gabriela Ortiz; Deborah Horney; Mayank A Nanavaty
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2017-08-14

Review 4.  A Review of Emerging Tear Proteomics Research on the Ocular Surface in Ocular Allergy.

Authors:  Esrin Aydin; Poshmaal Dhar; Moneisha Gokhale; Luke Chong; Serap Azizoglu; Cenk Suphioglu
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-16

Review 5.  A Case-Cohort Study of Exfoliation Risk Factors and Literature Review.

Authors:  Ahmad M Mansour; Anastasios G P Konstas; Hana A Mansour; Abdul R Charbaji; Khalil M El Jawhari
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04-30

Review 6.  Targeted Drug Delivery Systems for the Treatment of Glaucoma: Most Advanced Systems Review.

Authors:  Olga Cegielska; Paweł Sajkiewicz
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 4.329

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.