Literature DB >> 10225793

The effects of surface roughness and polymethylmethacrylate precoating on the radiographic and clinical results of the Iowa hip prosthesis. A study of patients less than fifty years old.

S M Sporer1, J J Callaghan, J P Olejniczak, D D Goetz, R C Johnston.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to compare the results associated with two different surface finishes (bead-blasted and grit-blasted) for Iowa femoral components used in total hip arthroplasties performed between January 1979 and June 1991 in patients who were less than fifty years old.
METHODS: Between January 1979 and December 1985, thirty-six primary total hip replacements were performed in twenty-five patients with insertion of a bead-blasted Iowa femoral component (average surface roughness, 0.8 micrometer) with cement and insertion of a titanium-backed acetabular component (thirty-five hips) or non-metal-backed acetabular component (one hip) with cement. Between January 1986 and June 1991, forty-five primary total hip replacements were performed in thirty-seven patients with use of a precoated grit-blasted Iowa femoral component (average surface roughness, 2.1 micrometers) and a Harris-Galante-I porous ingrowth acetabular component (forty-one hips) or an Osteonics component (four hips). The only change in the design of the femoral component (other than the surface finish) between the two consecutive series was the addition of polymethylmethacrylate precoating to the proximal third of all forty-five grit-blasted stems and modularity of the femoral head of the last eight grit-blasted stems.
RESULTS: No hip was lost to follow-up. The duration of radiographic follow-up of the hips treated with the bead-blasted component averaged 11.3 years (range, ten to sixteen years) postoperatively, whereas that of the hips treated with the precoated grit-blasted component averaged 8.2 years (range, five to eleven years). Two (6 percent) of the bead-blasted femoral components were revised because of aseptic loosening compared with eight (18 percent) of the precoated grit-blasted components. Four bead-blasted components (11 percent) were either radiographically loose or were revised because of loosening compared with eleven precoated grit-blasted components (24 percent). Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves evaluated with log-rank analysis revealed that the bead-blasted Iowa femoral components were revised because of aseptic loosening (p = 0.0184) and were radiographically loose (p = 0.0068) less often than the precoated grit-blasted Iowa femoral components.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the present study have led the senior ones of us to resume using femoral components with a polished surface and fixed with cement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10225793     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199904000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  11 in total

1.  [The cemented MS-30 stem. A multi-surgeon series of 333 consecutive cases].

Authors:  M Clauss; T Reitzel; M Pritsch; U J Schlegel; R G Bitsch; V Ewerbeck; H Mau; S J Breusch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Stem-cement porosity may explain early loosening of cemented femoral hip components: experimental-computational in vitro study.

Authors:  Kenneth A Mann; Leatha A Damron; Mark A Miller; Amos Race; Michael T Clarke; Richard J Cleary
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Minimum 10-year survival of Kerboull cemented stems according to surface finish.

Authors:  Moussa Hamadouche; François Baqué; Nicolas Lefevre; Marcel Kerboull
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  High failure rate of a modern, proximally roughened, cemented stem for total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  A Grose; A González Della Valle; P Bullough; S Lyman; I Tomek; P Pellicci
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-04-29       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Basic science considerations in primary total hip replacement arthroplasty.

Authors:  Saqeb B Mirza; Douglas G Dunlop; Sukhmeet S Panesar; Syed G Naqvi; Shafat Gangoo; Saif Salih
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2010-05-11

6.  Design-related risk factors for revision of primary cemented stems.

Authors:  Truike M Thien; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Improved survival of uncemented versus cemented femoral stems in patients aged < 70 years in a community total joint registry.

Authors:  John Wechter; Thomas K Comfort; Penny Tatman; Susan Mehle; Terence J Gioe
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Outcome of an ultrashort metaphyseal-fitting anatomic cementless stem in highly active obese and non-obese patients.

Authors:  Young-Hoo Kim; Jang-Won Park; Jun-Shik Kim
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Long-term Outcome of Polished Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jin-Young Park; Hong-Joon Han; Seok-Jong Baik; Suc-Hyun Kweon
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2015-06-30

10.  Massive femoral osteolysis secondary to loosening of a cemented roughened long stem: a case report.

Authors:  Yasuaki Tamaki; Tomohiro Goto; Daisuke Hamada; Toshihiko Nishisho; Kiminori Yukata; Suzue Naoto; Hiroshi Egawa; Koichi Sairyo
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2014-06-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.