Literature DB >> 18196414

Minimum 10-year survival of Kerboull cemented stems according to surface finish.

Moussa Hamadouche1, François Baqué, Nicolas Lefevre, Marcel Kerboull.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The optimal surface finish for a cemented THA stem is still debated. We hypothesized surface finish would influence survival of Kerboull cemented hip arthroplasties and a matte finish would have lower survival. We reviewed survival of 433 total hip arthroplasties in 395 patients: 284 consecutive patients (310 hips) were enrolled in a prospective, randomized study of polished (165 hips) or matte finish stems (145 hips) and compared to a historical series of satin stems (123 hips) in 111 patients. The satin and matte finish implants had similar geometry but the polished was quadrangular rather than oval. Finish roughnesses were: polished (radius, 0.04 microm), satin (radius, 0.9 microm), and matte (radius, 1.7 microm). The mean age of the patients at the time of the index arthroplasty was 63.6 years. The survival rate at 13 years, using radiographic loosening as the end point, was 97.3%+/-2.6% for polished stems, 97.1%+/-2.1% for satin stems, and 78.9%+/-5.8% for matte stems. The data suggest survival of Kerboull stems was higher with a polished or satin surface finish than with a matte finish. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18196414      PMCID: PMC2505154          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-007-0074-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  32 in total

Review 1.  The 'French paradox.'.

Authors:  F Langlais; M Kerboull; L Sedel; R S M Ling
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-01

2.  Analysis of long-term cemented total hip arthroplasty retrievals.

Authors:  William J Maloney; Thomas Schmalzried; William H Harris
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  A prospective randomized trial of cemented femoral components with polished versus grit-blasted surface finish and identical stem geometry.

Authors:  Thomas Parker Vail; Devon Goetz; Michael Tanzer; David A Fisher; Craig G Mohler; John J Callaghan
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  A rough surface finish adversely affects the survivorship of a cemented femoral stem.

Authors:  Alejandro González Della Valle; Adriana Zoppi; Margaret G E Peterson; Eduardo A Salvati
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Loosening of matt and polished cemented femoral stems.

Authors:  D W Howie; R G Middleton; K Costi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1998-07

6.  Cemented femoral component surface finish mechanics.

Authors:  R D Crowninshield; J D Jennings; M L Laurent; W J Maloney
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Total hip arthroplasty for Crowe type IV developmental hip dysplasia: a long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  M Kerboull; M Hamadouche; L Kerboull
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Failure of the cement-bone interface. A consequence of strengthening the cement-prosthesis interface?

Authors:  R C Gardiner; W J Hozack
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1994-01

9.  Cement strain measurement surrounding loose and well-fixed femoral component stems.

Authors:  R D Crowninshield; J R Tolbert
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1983-09

10.  "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening.

Authors:  T A Gruen; G M McNeice; H C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  8 in total

1.  Dual mobility cup: dislocation rate and survivorship at ten years of follow-up.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Prudhon; André Ferreira; Régis Verdier
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  The effect of a collar and surface finish on cemented femoral stems: a prospective randomised trial of four stem designs.

Authors:  Jonathan Hutt; Alexandra Hazlerigg; Ansari Aneel; Geoffrey Epie; Husam Dabis; Roy Twyman; Andrew Cobb
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Length of clinically proven cemented hip stems: state of the art or subject to improvement?

Authors:  Moussa Hamadouche; Alexander Jahnke; Caroline Scemama; Bernd Alexander Ishaque; Markus Rickert; Luc Kerboull; Eike Jakubowitz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Cemented Müller straight stem total hip replacement: 18 year survival, clinical and radiological outcomes.

Authors:  Vasileios S Nikolaou; Demetrios Korres; Stergios Lallos; Andreas Mavrogenis; Ioannis Lazarettos; Ioannis Sourlas; Nicolas Efstathopoulos
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2013-10-18

5.  Risk factors for aseptic loosening of Müller-type straight stems: a registry-based analysis of 828 consecutive cases with a minimum follow-up of 16 years.

Authors:  Martin Clauss; Silke Gersbach; Andre Butscher; Thomas Ilchmann
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  Similar effect of stem geometry on radiological changes with 2 types of cemented straight stem: The Müller stem and the Virtec stem compared in 711 hips.

Authors:  Martin Clauss; Lilianna Bolliger; Daniel Brandenberger; Peter E Ochsner; Thomas Ilchmann
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 7.  Do outcomes reported in randomised controlled trials of joint replacement surgery fulfil the OMERACT 2.0 Filter? A review of the 2008 and 2013 literature.

Authors:  Peter D H Wall; Bethan L Richards; Andrew Sprowson; Rachelle Buchbinder; Jasvinder A Singh
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2017-05-30

8.  Biomechanical behaviour of a French femoral component with thin cement mantle: The 'French paradox' may not be a paradox after all.

Authors:  Y Numata; A Kaneuji; L Kerboull; E Takahashi; T Ichiseki; K Fukui; J Tsujioka; N Kawahara
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 5.853

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.