Literature DB >> 17149748

Stem-cement porosity may explain early loosening of cemented femoral hip components: experimental-computational in vitro study.

Kenneth A Mann1, Leatha A Damron, Mark A Miller, Amos Race, Michael T Clarke, Richard J Cleary.   

Abstract

A combination of laboratory experiment and computational simulation was performed to assess the role of interface porosity on stem migration. The early motion of in vitro prepared cemented femoral components was measured during application of cyclic stair climbing loads. Following testing, transverse sections were obtained and the distribution of pores at the stem-cement interface was determined. Finite element models of cemented stem constructs were developed and a scheme was implemented to randomly assign pores to the stem-cement interface. For a series of 14 in vitro prepared components, pore fractions at the stem-cement interface ranged from 23% to 67%. The majority of pores at the stem-cement interface were less than 1 mm in length with a mean length of 1.27 +/- 2.7 mm and thickness of 0.12 +/- 0.11 mm. For stems with large pore fractions, pores tended to coalesce in longer extended gaps over the stem surface. Finite element and experimental models both revealed strong positive correlations (r(2) = 0.55-0.72; p < 0.0001) between stem-cement pore fraction and stem internal rotation, suggesting that the presence and extent of pores could explain the early motion of the stems. There was an increased volume of cement at risk of fatigue failure with increasing stem migration. Pore fractions greater than 30% resulted in large increases in stem internal rotation, suggesting that attempts to maintain surface porosity at or below this level may be desirable to minimize the risk of clinical loosening. (c) 2006 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17149748      PMCID: PMC1913200          DOI: 10.1002/jor.20330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  34 in total

1.  Increased migration of the SHP prosthesis: radiostereometric comparison with the Lubinus SP2 design in 40 cases.

Authors:  B Nivbrant; J Kärrholm; P Söderlund
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1999-12

2.  A theoretical and experimental analysis of polymerization shrinkage of bone cement: A potential major source of porosity.

Authors:  J L Gilbert; J M Hasenwinkel; R L Wixson; E P Lautenschlager
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2000-10

3.  Residual stresses at the stem-cement interface of an idealized cemented hip stem.

Authors:  N Nuño; G Avanzolini
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  A comparative FEA of the debonding process in different concepts of cemented hip implants.

Authors:  M A Pérez; J M García-Aznar; M Doblaré; B Seral; F Seral
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 2.242

5.  The effects of fluid penetration and interfacial porosity on the fixation of cemented femoral components.

Authors:  K Iesaka; W L Jaffe; C M Jones; F J Kummer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-09

6.  A rough surface finish adversely affects the survivorship of a cemented femoral stem.

Authors:  Alejandro González Della Valle; Adriana Zoppi; Margaret G E Peterson; Eduardo A Salvati
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: a review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases.

Authors:  P Herberts; H Malchau
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2000-04

8.  Early failure of precoated femoral components in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alvin Ong; Kirk L Wong; Max Lai; Jonathan P Garino; Marvin E Steinberg
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Radiographic risk signs for loosening after cemented THA: 61 loose stems and 23 loose sockets compared with 42 controls.

Authors:  C N Strömberg; P Herberts; B Palmertz; G Garellick
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1996-02

10.  Comparison of clinical outcomes in total hip arthroplasty using rough and polished cemented stems with essentially the same geometry.

Authors:  Dennis K Collis; Craig G Mohler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  5 in total

1.  Peri-implant stress correlates with bone and cement morphology: Micro-FE modeling of implanted cadaveric glenoids.

Authors:  Hwabok Wee; April D Armstrong; Wesley W Flint; Allen R Kunselman; Gregory S Lewis
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Functional interface micromechanics of 11 en-bloc retrieved cemented femoral hip replacements.

Authors:  Kenneth A Mann; Mark A Miller; Nico Verdonschot; Timothy H Izant; Amos Race
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.717

3.  Random damage and characteristics of debris particles are two important and yet ignored factors in the mechanical integrity of the stem-cement interface of a total hip replacement: influence of the surface finish of the metal stem.

Authors:  Gang Qi; Steven F Wayne; Kenneth A Mann; Bin Zhang; Gladius Lewis
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  On the way to total integration of prosthetic pylon with residuum.

Authors:  Mark Pitkin
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2009

5.  A modified PMMA cement (Sub-cement) for accelerated fatigue testing of cemented implant constructs using cadaveric bone.

Authors:  Amos Race; Mark A Miller; Kenneth A Mann
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 2.712

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.