| Literature DB >> 25050188 |
Yasuaki Tamaki1, Tomohiro Goto1, Daisuke Hamada1, Toshihiko Nishisho1, Kiminori Yukata1, Suzue Naoto1, Hiroshi Egawa1, Koichi Sairyo1.
Abstract
The surface finish of a femoral stem plays an important role in the longevity of cemented total hip arthroplasty. In efforts to decrease the rate of aseptic loosening, some prostheses have been designed to have a roughened surface that enhances bonding between the prosthesis and cement, but clinical outcomes remain controversial. We present a rare case of massive osteolysis with extreme femoral expansion that developed after cemented revision total hip arthroplasty. The destructive changes in the femur were attributable to abnormal motion of the stem and were aggravated by the roughened precoated surface of the long femoral component. Revision surgery using a total femur prosthesis was performed because there was insufficient remaining bone to fix the new prosthesis. The surgical technique involved wrapping polypropylene meshes around the prosthesis to create an insertion for the soft tissue, which proved useful for preventing muscular weakness and subsequent dislocation of the hip.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25050188 PMCID: PMC4094698 DOI: 10.1155/2014/840267
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Case Rep Orthop ISSN: 2090-6757
Figure 1Radiographs of the left femur and knee at initial presentation. Anteroposterior (a) and lateral (b) views of the left femur 18 years after revision surgery show severe loosening of the acetabular cup and femoral stem. Radiographs of the left knee show the distal end of the stem had perforated the medial femoral condyle, reaching subcutaneous tissue through the knee joint (c), (d).
Figure 2Computed tomography (CT) images of the left femur. Coronal CT image of the left femur shows a massive osteolytic lesion involving two-thirds of the proximal femur with thin cortical fragments surrounding the stem (a). Most of the cement mantle has disappeared except around the greater trochanter and middle of the stem. Axial views from the dotted lines are noted (b)–(d).
Figure 3A photograph of the implanted total femur prosthesis (a). Polypropylene meshes wrapped around the prosthesis to create attachment of the surrounding soft tissue (b).
Figure 4Postoperative radiographs of the left femur showing the total femur prosthesis as implanted. (a) Anteroposterior view. (b) Lateral view.
Figure 5Histologic findings of the scar tissue. There are numerous foamy macrophages but no evidence of acute inflammation. Scale bar: 50 μm.