Literature DB >> 10212421

Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in heterosexuals, homosexuals, and bisexuals.

D McFadden1, E G Pasanen.   

Abstract

Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs) were previously shown to be significantly less strong in homosexual and bisexual females than in heterosexual females. Here it is reported that the spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) of those same 60 homosexual and bisexual females were less numerous and weaker than those in 57 heterosexual females. That is, the SOAEs of the homosexual and bisexual females were intermediate to those of heterosexual females and heterosexual males. The SOAE and CEOAE data both suggest that the cochleas of homosexual and bisexual females have been partially masculinized, possibly as part of some prenatal processes that also masculinized whatever brain structures are responsible for sexual orientation. For males of all sexual orientation, the SOAEs were less numerous and weaker than for the females, and there were no significant differences among the 56 heterosexual, 51 homosexual, and 11 bisexual males. All subjects passed a hearing screening test. When all SOAEs above 3000 Hz were excluded (as a control against incipient, undetected hearing loss) the same results were obtained as with the full range of data (550-9000 Hz). The differential use of oral contraceptives by the heterosexual and nonheterosexual females also could not explain the differences in their OAEs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Americas; Behavior; Biology; Bisexuals--women; Developed Countries; Heterosexuals--women; Homosexuals--women; North America; Northern America; Physiology; Research Report; Sensory Effects; Sex Behavior; Texas; United States; Women

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10212421     DOI: 10.1121/1.426845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  19 in total

1.  Differences by sex, ear, and sexual orientation in the time intervals between successive peaks in auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Michelle D Hsieh; Adrian Garcia-Sierra; Craig A Champlin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Comparing behavioral and physiological measures of combination tones: sex and race differences.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Erin M Leshikar; Michelle D Hsieh; Mindy M Maloney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Sexual orientation and the auditory system.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 8.606

4.  Correlations between otoacoustic emissions and performance in common psychoacoustical tasks.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Mindy M Maloney; Erin M Leshikar; Michelle H Pho
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Differences in common psychoacoustical tasks by sex, menstrual cycle, and race.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Mindy M Maloney; Erin M Leshikar; Michelle H Pho
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Sex differences in distortion-product and transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions compared.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; Mindy M Maloney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  Masculinization of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Otoacoustic emissions, auditory evoked potentials and self-reported gender in people affected by disorders of sex development (DSD).

Authors:  Amy B Wisniewski; Blas Espinoza-Varas; Christopher E Aston; Shelagh Edmundson; Craig A Champlin; Edward G Pasanen; Dennis McFadden
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.587

9.  Dissociation between distortion-product and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in sheep (Ovis aries).

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Michelle D Valero; Eila K Roberts; Theresa M Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 10.  Estrogenic modulation of auditory processing: a vertebrate comparison.

Authors:  Melissa L Caras
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 8.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.