Literature DB >> 10201856

The role of medical problems and behavioral risks in explaining patterns of prenatal care use among high-risk women.

L L Clarke1, M K Miller, S L Albrecht, B Frentzen, A Cruz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the associations between maternal medical conditions and behavioral risks and the patterns of prenatal care use among high-risk women. DATA SOURCE/STUDY
DESIGN: Data on over 25,000 high-risk deliveries to African American and white women using multinomial logistic regression to predict the odds of adequate-plus care relative to three other categories of care. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION
METHODS: Data were extracted from records maintained by the University of Florida/Shands Hospital maternity clinic on all deliveries between 1987 and 1994; records for white and for African American women were subset to examine racial differences in medical conditions, health behaviors, and patterns of prenatal care use. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Net of sociodemographic and fertility-related characteristics, African American and white women with late antepartum conditions and hypertension problems had significantly higher odds of receiving adequate-plus care, as well as no care or inadequate care, relative to adequate care. White women with gynecological disease and medical/surgical problems were significantly less likely to receive no care or inadequate care, as were African American women with gynecological disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Maternal medical conditions explain much but not all of the adequate-plus prenatal care use. More than 13 percent of African American women and 20 percent of white women with no reported medical problems or behavioral risks used adequate-plus care. Additional research is needed to understand this excess use and its possibilities in mediating birth outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10201856      PMCID: PMC1088989     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  13 in total

1.  Birth weights of infants of black and white mothers without pregnancy complications.

Authors:  T C Hulsey; A H Levkoff; G R Alexander
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Prenatal care evaluation and cohort analyses.

Authors:  J Tyson; D Guzick; C R Rosenfeld; R Lasky; N Gant; J Jiminez; S Heartwell
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Prenatal care utilization: its measurement and relationship to pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  G R Alexander; D A Cornely
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  A comparison of prenatal care use in the United States and Europe.

Authors:  P Buekens; M Kotelchuck; B Blondel; F B Kristensen; J H Chen; G Masuy-Stroobant
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 5.  Does prenatal care improve birth outcomes? A critical review.

Authors:  K Fiscella
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  For every dollar spent--the cost-savings argument for prenatal care.

Authors:  J Huntington; F A Connell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-11-10       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  What you measure is what you get: prenatal care and women's health.

Authors:  P H Wise
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Differences in black and white infant birth weights: the role of maternal demographic factors and medical complications of pregnancy.

Authors:  T C Hulsey; A H Levkoff; G R Alexander; M Tompkins
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 0.954

9.  Racial and ethnic differences in determinants of intrauterine growth retardation and other compromised birth outcomes.

Authors:  W P Frisbie; M Biegler; P de Turk; D Forbes; S G Pullum
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Comparing mothers' reports on the content of prenatal care received with recommended national guidelines for care.

Authors:  M D Kogan; G R Alexander; M Kotelchuck; D A Nagey; B W Jack
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

View more
  3 in total

1.  Association between prenatal care utilization and risk of preterm birth among Chinese women.

Authors:  Bin Zhang; Rong Yang; Sheng-Wen Liang; Jing Wang; Jen Jen Chang; Ke Hu; Guang-Hui Dong; Rong-Hua Hu; Louise H Flick; Yi-Ming Zhang; Dan Zhang; Qing-Jie Li; Tong-Zhang Zheng; Shun-Qing Xu; Shao-Ping Yang; Zheng-Min Qian
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2017-08-08

2.  Prenatal care utilization among non-Hispanic Whites, African Americans, and Mexican Americans.

Authors:  W P Frisbie; S Echevarria; R A Hummer
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2001-03

3.  Infant health production functions: what a difference the data make.

Authors:  Nancy E Reichman; Hope Corman; Kelly Noonan; Dhaval Dave
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.395

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.